Acer S240HLBID 24 inch Monitor UK
- Full HD display for high picture clarity and elegant colours
- Acer S240HLBID monitors sport a slim profile that lets them fit nicely in spaces of any size
- Acer eColour management optimises image performance
- Extensive connectivity: VGA, DVI (with HDCP), HDMI
- 100 million:1 contrast ratio via Acer Adaptive Contrast Management (ACM); enhanced technology enables a dramatic improvement of gradation and detail
Acer S240HLBID 24 inch Monitor Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
- Acer K242HLbd 24 inch Widescreen FHD LED Monitor (5 ms, 100 M:1, ACM 250 Nits, LED, DVI with HDCP) - Black
- AmazonBasics Adjustable Monitor Stand
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the very best to use one filter or another. And is that the encounter of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, work automation... What is the very best screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to have well-defined of opting for the earliest one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the very best PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later achieve your recommended screen, but with least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fulfils nicely by mean of a lot of of the multi media subject situation that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by mean of the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving means to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of enjoying a lot of training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by mean of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to secure pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a quickly review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important position the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the enjoying distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the complete workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by mean of one of the a lot of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the very best photograph outstanding as a rule. equally by enjoying angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness gains is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is attainable to achieve a higher gains when playing in a requiring means the a lot of recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be exact cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of unique option. You can view a lot more code and open an array of apps with once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another alternative would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having reachable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who try to make use of several packages with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra increased definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you work with 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as packages and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we incorporate help and support for innovation just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by mean of 1080p resolution or as is the situation by mean of some 32" by mean of 1440p resolution try to make sure you participate in with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more robust PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of aspect in games and we will secure to participate in by mean of adjustments with increased or ultra tier while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the very best right now.