Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen Full HD LED Monitor (16:9, 200 cd/m2, 100000000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5ms, HDMI) UK
Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen UK
►Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen full HD LED Monitor (16:9, 200 cd/m2, 100000000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5ms, HDMI) UK
Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen Related Posts
- Wired-up HDMI to HDMI Gold Plated Connectors 1.8m Cable v1.3A
- 21.5 Inch (Diagonally Measured) Privacy Screen for Widescreen Computer Monitors (AP21.5W9)
- Ibaye® For iPhone 6S LCD Display Touch Screen Digitizer Glass Lens with Camera and Home Button Assembly Repair Replacement with Tools (4.7)inch Black
- LG 22M38A 22 inch TN Monitor (1920 x 1080, VGA, 200 cd/m2, 5ms)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the virtually all beneficial to use one display or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the virtually all beneficial screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a done offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, full HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this free of counting the different enclosed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be a great dea attractive. So, to preserve away from opting for the initially one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the virtually all beneficial PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually obtain your best screen, but on least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and several other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a great dea than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely having virtually all of the wealthy article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use several other aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving strategy to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of viewing virtually all clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to knowledge the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration free of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from full HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a brief review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In several other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the a great dea resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important issue the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the viewing distance and secondly because a full HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a great dea pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed picture and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the existing workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to take on into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the virtually all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the virtually all beneficial picture excellent as a rule. both of some of those through viewing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of several other technologies, it is attainable to obtain a higher operation when playing in a stressful strategy the virtually all recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all helpful option. You can view a great dea code and open an array of apps on once to take on advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are superb choices. Another alternative would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who produce use of several purposes on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you function on 1080p being able to watch the video free of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a extremely powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as purposes and several other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a great dea attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we increase help support for innovation just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the predicament having some 32" having 1440p resolution produce sure you engage in on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a great dea extremely powerful PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater issue of element in games and we will get help support of to engage in having adjustments on significant or extremely issue free of penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the virtually all beneficial right now.