Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen Full HD LED Monitor (16:9, 200 cd/m2, 100000000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5ms, HDMI) UK
Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen UK
►Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen 100 % HD LED Monitor (16:9, 200 cd/m2, 100000000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5ms, HDMI) UK
Acer G236HLBbid 23 inch Widescreen Related Posts
- Wired-up HDMI to HDMI Gold Plated Connectors 1.8m Cable v1.3A
- Wavlink USB 3.0 Universal Dual Display Docking Station Support HDMI / DVI / VGA with 6 USB Ports (2 USB 3.0 + 4 USB 2.0),Gigabit Ethernet and Audio Jack for PC and Mac
- Crucial CT51264BD160BJ 4 GB Single Ranked 1600 MT/s Desktop Memory
- Palit PCI-E GTX1050TI StormX 4 GB 128-Bit D/3DP/HDMI Graphics Card - Grey
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the appropriate to use one panel or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, deliver the results automation... What is the appropriate screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this not having counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to realize which option would be a great dea attractive. So, to prevent opting for the initial one you see or the one that the vast majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the appropriate PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on attain your suitable screen, but from least you will realize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and various other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a great dea than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely with the vast majority of of the multi media subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use various other aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving means to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of watching the vast majority of video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to experience the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration not having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a swift review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In various other options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the a great dea resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the vast majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important issue the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the watching distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a great dea pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed picture and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to browse for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the entire workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the the vast majority of controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the appropriate picture excellent as a rule. every solitary by watching angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functionality is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a amazing option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of various other technologies, it is practical to attain a higher functionality when playing in a tense means the the vast majority of up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be the vast majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the vast majority of significant option. You can view a great dea code and open numerous apps from once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are amazing choices. Another optional would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the amazing choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who produce use of several programs from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you deliver the results from 1080p being able to watch the video not having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as programs and various other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a great dea attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add a great dea help and support for technologies just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the claim with some 32" with 1440p resolution produce sure you perform from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a great dea robust PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater position of fine detail in games and we will obtain to perform with adjustments from higher or mega position not having penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the appropriate right now.