Hannspree HE225DPB 21.5 Inch Full HD Widescreen LED Monitor (1000:1, 5 ms, VGA, DVI D, 1920 x 1080) UK
Hannspree HE225DPB 21 5 Inch Full UK
- Brightness 200cd/m2
- Active Contrast Ratio
- Full HD 16:9
HannsG 215IN LED HE225DPB 169 5MS 1920X1080 VGA SPKR TILT DVI UK HE225DPB Monitors Monitors
HE225DPB 169 5MS 1920X1080 VGA SPKR TILT DVI UK HE225DPB Monitors Monitors
►Hannspree HE225DPB 21.5-Inch 100 % HD Widescreen LED Monitor (1000:1, 5 ms, VGA, DVI-D, 1920 x 1080) UK
Hannspree HE225DPB 21 5 Inch 100 % Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- HannsG HE247DPB 23.6-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor (250 cd/m2, 1000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5 ms, DVI)
- DVI Cable, Rankie 1.8m DVI to DVI Monitor Cable Male to Male (Black) - R1350
- AMD APU A6-6400K Black Edition (3.90GHz Richland Dual Core Processor, Socket FM 2) (AD640KOKHLBOX)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the capability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most successful to use one panel or another. And is that the encounter of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the most successful screen?
As you know, in the market space there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be extra attractive. So, to avoid opting for the primary one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most successful PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently obtain your ideal screen, but during least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that succeeds with nicely by means of most of the multimedia system subject problem that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by means of the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving approach to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that during the time of seeing most clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not during all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. by means of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a easy review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may nicely think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important point the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit during a distance of less than one meter you have to appear for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the existing workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go by means of one of the most controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most successful photograph top quality as a rule. the two by means of seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functionality is significantly better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to significantly better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is potential to obtain a higher functionality when playing in a arduous approach the most popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most useful option. You can view extra code and open a vast variety of apps during once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are good choices. Another alternate would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the market space toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who try to make use of several apps during the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you give good results during 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as apps and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring help support for solutions just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by means of 1080p resolution or as is the case by means of some 32" by means of 1440p resolution try to make sure you engage in during an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra effective PC during the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater top quality of detail in games and we will acquire to engage in by means of adjustments during higher or extremely top quality without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most successful right now.