Hannspree HE225DPB 21.5 Inch Full HD Widescreen LED Monitor (1000:1, 5 ms, VGA, DVI D, 1920 x 1080) UK
Hannspree HE225DPB 21 5 Inch Full UK
- LED Backlight Monitor
- 40,000,000:1 Active Contrast
- 5ms Fast Response Time
- Built-In Stereo Speakers
- Low Power Consumption
- Adjustable Display
HannsG 215IN LED HE225DPB 169 5MS 1920X1080 VGA SPKR TILT DVI UK HE225DPB Monitors Monitors
HE225DPB 169 5MS 1920X1080 VGA SPKR TILT DVI UK HE225DPB Monitors Monitors
►Hannspree HE225DPB 21.5-Inch filled HD Widescreen LED Monitor (1000:1, 5 ms, VGA, DVI-D, 1920 x 1080) UK
Hannspree HE225DPB 21 5 Inch filled Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- HannsG HE247DPB 23.6-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor (250 cd/m2, 1000:1, 1920 x 1080, 5 ms, DVI)
- AMD APU A6-6400K Black Edition (3.90GHz Richland Dual Core Processor, Socket FM 2) (AD640KOKHLBOX)
- G.Skill Ripjaws 4 Series - DDR4 - 8 GB : 2 x 4 GB - DIMM 288-pin
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electricity needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one computer screen or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a filled offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be much more attractive. So, to retain clear of opting for the first one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on gain your excellent screen, but within least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and numerous aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely along with almost all of the wealthy content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use numerous aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving process to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that within the time of visiting almost all videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not within all attractive. in fact so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That help you to just take pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. in fact so I will do a speedy review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In numerous options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may very well think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important point the computer screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed seem and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit within a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a computer screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the complete workspace. Also, dependent on on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the almost all controversial points. In computer screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best seem quality as a rule. both equally through visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of numerous technologies, it is feasible to gain a higher performance when playing in a asking for process the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which computer screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all helpful option. You can view much more code and open several apps within once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are superb choices. Another alternative would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who try to make use of several software within the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really elevated definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. in fact if you give good results within 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a really powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as software and numerous tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the finest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add service for solutions similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the claim along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution try to make sure you play within an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more really powerful PC within the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stages of fine detail in games and we will obtain to play along with adjustments within elevated or really stages without penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.