BenQ GL2250HM LED TN Panel 21.5 inch Widescreen Multimedia Monitor (1920 x 1080, DVI, HDMI, Speakers, 12M:1, 2 ms GTG and 1000:1) Glossy Black UK
BenQ GL2250HM LED TN Panel 21 5 UK
►BenQ GL2250HM LED TN Panel 21.5 inch Widescreen hiburan Monitor (1920 x 1080, DVI, HDMI, Speakers, 12M:1, 2 ms GTG and 1000:1) - Glossy Black UK
BenQ GL2250HM LED TN Panel 21 5 Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Duronic DM351X2 Single LCD LED Desk Mount Arm Monitor Stand Bracket with Adjustability (Tilt ±15°|Swivel 180°|Rotate 360°) + 10 Year Warranty
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one monitor or another. And is that the go by using of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, company automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a comprehensive offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, full HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to stop opting for the primary one you see or the one that the vast majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the street attain your excellent screen, but at least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and many aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely using the vast majority of of the hiburan articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use many aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving way to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of visiting the vast majority of online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to go by using the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from full HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a quick review to have them certainly located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the vast majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A issue of size
If the resolution is an important factor the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a full HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed picture and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring certainly is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the the vast majority of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred picture superior as a rule. both equally by using visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is significantly more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to significantly more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many technologies, it is feasible to attain a higher genera when playing in a strenuous way the the vast majority of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be the vast majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the vast majority of significant option. You can view significantly more code and open many different apps at once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another substitute would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to area one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or favorite songs ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having reachable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who get use of several programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega greater definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you give good results at 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a mega powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as certainly as programs and many tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest feasible refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we grow assistance for innovation similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the claim using some 32" using 1440p resolution get sure you execute at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more mega powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater ranges of include things similar to in games and we will get to execute using adjustments at greater or mega ranges lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.