Philips 246V5LSB 24 Inch UK
- Device type: monitor
- Clear screen
- High Quality output
- Device type: monitor
- Clear screen
- High Quality output
PhilIPS 246V5LSB00 24 169 VLine Black Texture Finish wled 1920x1080 TN 170160 seeing Angle CR10 250 cdm2 10001 5ms 100x100 VESA Tilt 520 VGA DVID colon PSU 2 years service 246V5LSB00 Monitors Monitors
Black Texture Finish Wled 1920x1080
TN 170160 seeing Angle CR10 250
Cdm2 10001 5ms 100x100 VESA Tilt 520 VGA DVID colon PSU 2 Years service 246V5LSB00 Monitors Monitors
Philips 246V5LSB 24 Inch Related Posts
- AOC 21.5 inch LED Monitor, VGA, Vesa E2270SWN
- Duronic DM352 /BK PC Dual Monitor Arm Stand Desk Mount Bracket Clamp Double/Twin |LCD |LED | Tilt and Swivel (Tilt ±15°|Swivel 180°|Rotate 360°)
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- VonHaus Dual Monitor Screen Desk Mount Arm Double VESA Bracket for Twin 13" to 27" Computer Displays or TVs | Max 100x100 | Tilt, Rotate & Swivel Functions
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most suitable to use one display or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, company automation... What is the most suitable screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a comprehensive offer of screens. There are panoramic, especially panoramic, max HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be even more attractive. So, to always keep away from opting for the primary one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most suitable PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can after accomplish your fantastic screen, but within least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely using most of the numerous article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while the of 16:10 were somewhat widespread but little by little they were giving way to the of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that within the time of seeing most training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not within all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the especially panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to just take pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from max HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a short review to have them good located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become especially panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make any difference of size
If the resolution is an important position the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a max HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not the huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit within a distance of less than one meter you have to appear for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the entire workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the most controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most suitable impression top quality as a rule. every one of the because of seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness fina is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is achievable to accomplish a higher fina when playing in a stressful way the most recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be special cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most helpful option. You can view even more code and open various apps within once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or especially panoramic panels are good choices. Another different would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate oneself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the who generate use of several software within the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in especially high definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you get the job done within 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as software and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we design help for technologica like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the situation using some 32" using 1440p resolution generate sure you engage in within an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more successful PC within the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater set of outline in games and we will have to engage in using adjustments within high or especially set while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most suitable right now.