Iiyama Prolite B2483HS UK
- iiyama B2483HS-B1, ProLite. Display diagonal: 60.96 cm (24"), Response time: 2 ms, Display brightness: 300 cd/m. RMS rated power: 4W
- Colour of product: Black. Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces compatibility: 100 x 100 mm
- Swivel angle range: 45 - 90. Input voltage: 100 - 240V, Input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.5W
- Adjustable Display
Iiyama Prolite B2483HSB1 24 Black LED Height changeable TN 2ms 1 x VGA 1 x HDMI 1 x DVID Pivot Swivel Tilt presenters B2483HSB1 Monitors Monitors
24 Black LED Height
changeable TN 2ms
1 X VGA 1 X HDMI 1 X DVID Pivot Swivel Tilt presenters B2483HSB1 Monitors Monitors
Iiyama Prolite B2483HS Related Posts
- DP to HDMI,TechRise 2-Meters Gold Plated DisplayPort to HDTV HDMI Cable Converter Adapter ,FULL HD 1080P, Video and Audio Supportted - Male to Male
- IIYAMA ProLite E2483HS1 24 inch LED Monitor
- DP to DVI, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort DP to DVI Cable (Black) - R1109
- CSL 2m (metres) HQ premium DisplayPort (DP) to DVI cable | Certified / HDCP and EDID | Full HD resolution | 24 cart gold-plated contacts / 3-fold shielding | Graphics cards / Apple and PC / Projector / Monitor
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the virtually all beneficial to use one monitor or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business office automation... What is the virtually all beneficial screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this not having counting the different delivered technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the to start with one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the virtually all beneficial PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently adventure your excellent screen, but for least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you earn of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and a number of other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that complements nicely along with virtually all of the numerous content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use a number of other aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving technique to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of visiting virtually all video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to adventure the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration not having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a speedy review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In a number of other options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make any difference of size
If the resolution is an important stage the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the complete workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the virtually all controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the virtually all beneficial graphic high-quality as a rule. both equally by means of visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of a number of other technologies, it is doable to adventure a higher genera when playing in a hard technique the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all attention-grabbing option. You can view more code and open a vast array of apps for once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are good choices. Another option would be to earn use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who earn use of several packages for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you deliver the results for 1080p being able to watch the video not having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as packages and a number of other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine aid for modern advances similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the court case along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution earn sure you play for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more highly effective PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of aspect in games and we will have to play along with adjustments for significant or very tier not having penalizing the number of frames per second. For hard players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the virtually all beneficial right now.