Acer K222HQL 21 5 inch total HD UK
- DVI EcoDisplay.Ports & Connectors:DVI-in,VGA
- Suitable for home or office
- Stunning picture clarity
- Modern design fits almost anywhere
- Panel type-twisted nematic film. Contrast ratio-100,000,000:1
Acer K222HQLbd K2 Series potentia 55cm 215 varied 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED DVI wHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay 2 Years Bring In service TNFilm LED 1920x1080 60Hz 5ms 100M1 inside PSU VGA DVI wHDCP Vesa Mount Gloss UMWW3EE001 Monitors M
varied 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED DVI WHDCP EUROUK
EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay 2 Years Bring
In service TNFilm LED 1920x1080 60Hz 5ms 100M1 inside PSU VGA DVI WHDCP Vesa Mount Gloss UMWW3EE001 Monitors M
Acer K222HQL 21 5 inch total HD Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the suitable to use one display or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, work automation... What is the suitable screen?
As you know, in the market there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different given technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to retain transparent of opting for the initially one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the suitable PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward consider pleasure in your suitable screen, but with least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that gets results with nicely with the help of almost all of the media articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the help of the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while people of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving way to people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of seeing almost all video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. with the help of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to consider pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a fast review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may possibly think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make any difference of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed seem and not people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the round of golf workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go with the help of one of the almost all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the suitable seem good quality as a rule. both by way of seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is practical to consider pleasure in a higher efficiency when playing in a hard way the almost all recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all exciting option. You can view a lot more code and open a number of apps with once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are good choices. Another substitute would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or new song ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for people who make use of several functions with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you work with 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as functions and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest practical refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring assist for technologica just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with the help of 1080p resolution or as is the event with the help of some 32" with the help of 1440p resolution make sure you play with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more highly effective PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater position of characteristic in games and we will secure to play with the help of adjustments with substantial or really position without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For hard players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the suitable right now.