Iiyama XUB2390HS B1 23 Inch Ultra UK
- iiyama XUB2390HS-B1, ProLite. Display diagonal: 58.42 cm (23"), Response time: 5 ms, Display brightness: 250 cd/m. RMS rated power: 4W. Colour of product: Black
- Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces compatibility: 100 x 100 mm, Swivel angle range: -45 - 45. Input voltage: 100 - 240V, Input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.5W
- Brilliant Design
- Adjustable Display
Iiyama Prolite XUB2390HSB1 23 IPS extremely narrow Bezel Height varying IPS 5ms 1 x VGA 1 x HDMI 1 x DVID sound system XUB2390HSB1 Monitors Monitors
23 IPS extremely Slim
Bezel Height Adjustable
IPS 5ms 1 X VGA 1 X HDMI 1 X DVID sound system XUB2390HSB1 Monitors Monitors
Iiyama XUB2390HS B1 23 Inch extremely Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the greatest to use one monitor or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the greatest screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this devoid of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to realize which option would be even more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the first of all one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the greatest PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on achieve your best screen, but located at least you will realize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely using the majority of of the multimedia information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving strategy to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that located at the time of visiting the majority of movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not located at all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration devoid of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a speedy review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perfectly think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important point the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit located at a distance of less than one meter you have to investigation for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the entire workspace. Also, depending upon on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the the majority of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the greatest persona of quality as a rule. sometimes by visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is likely to achieve a higher efficiency when playing in a stressful strategy the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be special cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of significant option. You can view even more code and open numerous apps located at once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another option would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your body to editing video or seem ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who try to make use of several plans located at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you operate located at 1080p being able to watch the video devoid of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as plans and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we insert help for systems just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the predicament using some 32" using 1440p resolution try to make sure you participate in located at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more powerful PC located at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of detail in games and we will get to participate in using adjustments located at huge or extremely degree devoid of penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the greatest right now.