Iiyama XUB2390HS B1 23 Inch Ultra UK
- iiyama XUB2390HS-B1, ProLite. Display diagonal: 58.42 cm (23"), Response time: 5 ms, Display brightness: 250 cd/m. RMS rated power: 4W. Colour of product: Black
- Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces compatibility: 100 x 100 mm, Swivel angle range: -45 - 45. Input voltage: 100 - 240V, Input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.5W
- Brilliant Design
- Adjustable Display
Iiyama Prolite XUB2390HSB1 23 IPS mega narrow Bezel Height variable IPS 5ms 1 x VGA 1 x HDMI 1 x DVID presenters XUB2390HSB1 Monitors Monitors
23 IPS mega Slim
Bezel Height Adjustable
IPS 5ms 1 X VGA 1 X HDMI 1 X DVID presenters XUB2390HSB1 Monitors Monitors
Iiyama XUB2390HS B1 23 Inch mega Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the many successful to use one display or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, site of do the job automation... What is the many successful screen?
As you know, in the market there is a 100 % offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to avert opting for the initial one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the many successful PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently acquire your suitable screen, but for least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you create of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely with many of the multi media material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while the ones of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving process to the ones of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of seeing many films you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That helps you to enjoy the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No have to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a short review to have them well located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the ones of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important time the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not the ones huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the 100 % workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the many controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the many successful snapshot high-quality as a rule. while doing so by using seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is significantly better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to significantly better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is attainable to acquire a higher genera when playing in a asking for process the many recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many attention-grabbing option. You can view a lot more code and open an array of apps for once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are superb choices. Another different would be to create use of two screens 1080p, being able to site one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or hifi ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the ones who create use of several programs for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you do the job for 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have to have a impressive graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as programs and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put assistance for innovation such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the situation with some 32" with 1440p resolution create sure you play the game for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more impressive PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater high-quality of information in games and we will have to play the game with adjustments for huge or mega high-quality with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the many successful right now.