Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch Wide FHD LED Gaming Monitor with 144 Hz, 1 ms, 350 nits, DVI, HDMI, Acer EcoDisplay Black UK
Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch tremendous FHD UK
- 24 inch wide FHD LED gaming monitor, delivers brighter full HD 3D images
- Supports NVIDIA 3D LightBoost technology and NVIDIA Vision SION two glasses kit
- Ideal for gaming with 1 ms response time and 144 Hz frequency
- Extensive connectivity: VGA plus dual link DVI (with HDCP) plus HDMI plus line out
►Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch tremendous FHD LED Gaming Monitor by using 144 Hz, 1 ms, 350 nits, DVI, HDMI, Acer EcoDisplay - Black UK
Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch tremendous FHD Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideal to use one screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business office automation... What is the ideal screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to preserve away from opting for the to begin with one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideal PC monitor for you?
The to begin with thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can after realize your great screen, but in least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely by using almost all of the multi media articles and alternative content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving technique to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of visiting almost all video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to appreciate the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a easy review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important position the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the entire workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the almost all controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideal photograph high quality as a rule. both of those by using visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness effects is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is attainable to realize a higher effects when playing in a challenging technique the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all attention-grabbing option. You can view a lot more code and open many apps in once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are very good choices. Another alternative would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or new audio ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who get use of several functions in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you do the job in 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as functions and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest attainable refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring help support for technologica like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the case by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution get sure you get up in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more amazing PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater position of depth in games and we will become to get up by using adjustments in substantial or extremely position while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideal right now.