Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch Wide FHD LED Gaming Monitor with 144 Hz, 1 ms, 350 nits, DVI, HDMI, Acer EcoDisplay Black UK
Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch great FHD UK
- 24 inch wide FHD LED gaming monitor, delivers brighter full HD 3D images
- Supports NVIDIA 3D LightBoost technology and NVIDIA Vision SION two glasses kit
- Ideal for gaming with 1 ms response time and 144 Hz frequency
- Extensive connectivity: VGA plus dual link DVI (with HDCP) plus HDMI plus line out
►Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch great FHD LED Gaming Monitor with 144 Hz, 1 ms, 350 nits, DVI, HDMI, Acer EcoDisplay - Black UK
Acer GN246HLBbid 24 inch great FHD Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- CPO 1M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black
- WD 1 TB Desktop Hard Drive - Blue
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2x8 GB) DDR4 3000 MHz C15 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the perfect to use one show or another. And is that the go as a result of of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the perfect screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, max HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be even more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the to start with one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the perfect PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would including you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on get to your best screen, but during least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely with most of the media articles and alternative content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while the ones of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving technique to the ones of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that during the time of browsing most training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not during all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from max HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a rapid review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the ones of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important point the show size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a max HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not the ones huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit during a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a show size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the most controversial points. In show themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the perfect graphic high-quality as a rule. together as a result of browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is attainable to get to a higher performance when playing in a arduous technique the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which show would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most helpful option. You can view even more code and open several apps during once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another alternative would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to area one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the ones who come up with use of several functions during the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really high definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you give good results during 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as functions and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine aid for systems including Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the situation with some 32" with 1440p resolution come up with sure you play the game during an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more robust PC during the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater point of details in games and we will receive to play the game with adjustments during high or really point without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the perfect right now.