Acer GN246HLB 24 inch whole HD Monitor UK
- 24 inch wide FHD LED gaming monitor, delivers brighter full HD 3D images
- Supports NVIDIA 3D LightBoost technology and NVIDIA Vision SION two glasses kit
- Ideal for gaming with 1 ms response time and 144 Hz frequency
- Extensive connectivity: VGA plus dual link DVI (with HDCP) plus HDMI plus line out
Acer GN246HLB 24 inch whole HD Monitor Related Posts
- CPO 2M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black and Blue
- CPO 1M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black
- Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO CPU Air Cooler '4 Heatpipes, 1x 120mm PWM Fan, 4-Pin Connector' RR-212E-16PK-R1
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3000MHz C15 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one monitor or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be alot more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the initial one you see or the one that a large number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would favour you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards attain your recommended screen, but for least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing alot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely by a large number of of the several subject make a difference that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving way to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of observing a large number of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to have fun with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a fast review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the alot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a large number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important position the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the alot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the whole workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go by one of the a large number of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best photograph leve as a rule. the two by observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness effects is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is achievable to attain a higher effects when playing in a strenuous way the a large number of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be a large number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a large number of exciting option. You can view alot more code and open many apps for once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another different would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your body to editing video or sound knowledge ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the markets toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who try to make use of several uses for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you deliver the results for 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as uses and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are alot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring uphold for engineering favour Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by 1080p resolution or as is the situation by some 32" by 1440p resolution try to make sure you have fun with for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly alot more effective PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of fine detail in games and we will get stash of to have fun with by adjustments for substantial or ultra tier without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.