BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer monitor (2K QHD, 1440p, 100% sRGB, Rec. 709, graphic design, animation, CAD, low blue light, FlickerFree, Height adjustment stand) for photo editing. UK
BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer UK
- 32 inch, 2560 x 1440 2K/QHD resolution with 10 bit colour depth
- 100% sRGB and Rec. 709 colour space, enable precise photo-editing , retouching or video-editing works
- Tailor-made CAD/CAM and animation mode: For 3D drawing, animation works and industrial design and graphic art design
- Handy OSD controller makes it easy to switch between different colour modes or colour settings
- Flicker free technology
BenQ BL3200PT 32 LED DVID HDMI USB X 2 USB 30 X 2 present Port speakers 2514 IPS UWHD 2560 x 1440 4ms Glossy Black 30001 DSub Vesa Pivot Swivel 4545 Height diverse 130mm 9HLC3LBQBE Monitors Monitors
USB X 2 USB 30 X 2 present Port
speakers 2514 IPS UWHD 2560 X
1440 4ms Glossy Black 30001 DSub Vesa Pivot Swivel 4545 Height diverse 130mm 9HLC3LBQBE Monitors Monitors
►BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer monitor (2K QHD, 1440p, 100% sRGB, Rec. 709, graphic design, animation, CAD, low blue light, FlickerFree, Height treatment stand) for photo editing. UK
BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer Related Posts
- Samsung (MZ-V6E500BW) 500GB EVO PCI Express 3.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive
- Microsoft Surface Bluetooth Keyboard
- Dell 452-BBOO USB 3.0 Ultra HD Triple Video Docking Station
- StarTech.com 6 ft Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 Adapter Cable M/M - DisplayPort 4k with HBR2 support - 6 feet Mini DP to DP Cable
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one filter or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a entire offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this devoid of counting the different delivered technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to comprehend which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the first of all one you see or the one that a large number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later achieve your ideally suited screen, but located at least you will comprehend what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that complements nicely by a large number of of the several subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving strategy to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that located at the time of watching a large number of movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not located at all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. by a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That helps make it attainable for you to appreciate the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration devoid of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a brief review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one probably think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a large number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the watching distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit located at a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the entire workspace. Also, depending upon on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by one of the a large number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred graphic excellent as a rule. equally of many by watching angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a terrific option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is attainable to achieve a higher efficiency when playing in a strenuous strategy the a large number of recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a large number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a large number of useful option. You can view a lot more code and open distinct apps located at once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are terrific choices. Another different would be to help to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to destination one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate oneself to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the terrific choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who help to make use of several uses located at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super sizeable definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you operate located at 1080p being able to watch the video devoid of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as uses and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the greatest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine help and support for systems want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by 1080p resolution or as is the predicament by some 32" by 1440p resolution help to make sure you engage in located at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more amazing PC located at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater amount of details in games and we will get outlet of to engage in by adjustments located at sizeable or super amount devoid of penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.