BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer monitor (2K QHD, 1440p, 100% sRGB, Rec. 709, graphic design, animation, CAD, low blue light, FlickerFree, Height adjustment stand) for photo editing. UK
BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer UK
- 32 inch, 2560 x 1440 2K/QHD resolution with 10 bit colour depth
- 100% sRGB and Rec. 709 colour space, enable precise photo-editing , retouching or video-editing works
- Tailor-made CAD/CAM and animation mode: For 3D drawing, animation works and industrial design and graphic art design
- Handy OSD controller makes it easy to switch between different colour modes or colour settings
- Flicker free technology
BenQ BL3200PT 32 LED DVID HDMI USB X 2 USB 30 X 2 monitor Port loudspeakers 2514 IPS UWHD 2560 x 1440 4ms Glossy Black 30001 DSub Vesa Pivot Swivel 4545 Height varied 130mm 9HLC3LBQBE Monitors Monitors
USB X 2 USB 30 X 2 monitor Port
loudspeakers 2514 IPS UWHD 2560 X
1440 4ms Glossy Black 30001 DSub Vesa Pivot Swivel 4545 Height varied 130mm 9HLC3LBQBE Monitors Monitors
►BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer monitor (2K QHD, 1440p, 100% sRGB, Rec. 709, graphic design, animation, CAD, low blue light, FlickerFree, Height correction stand) for photo editing. UK
BenQ BL3200PT 32 Inch designer Related Posts
- Samsung (MZ-V6E500BW) 500GB EVO PCI Express 3.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive
- Microsoft Surface Bluetooth Keyboard
- StarTech.com 6 ft Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 Adapter Cable M/M - DisplayPort 4k with HBR2 support - 6 feet Mini DP to DP Cable
- Dell 452-BBOO USB 3.0 Ultra HD Triple Video Docking Station
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one panel or another. And is that the working experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the current market there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be extra attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the very first one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The very first thing I would opt for you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on accomplish your suitable screen, but for least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you create of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely using the majority of of the several content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving process to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of taking a look for the majority of online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to appreciate the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No need to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a short review to have them well located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important point the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look for distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed start looking and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the complete workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the the majority of controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best start looking excellent as a rule. each one of many throughout taking a look for angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is feasible to accomplish a higher performance when playing in a tense process the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of fascinating option. You can view extra code and open numerous apps for once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are great choices. Another treatment would be to create use of two screens 1080p, being able to put one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having made available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who create use of several software programs for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you operate for 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need to have a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as software programs and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the max refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine assist for solutions opt for Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance using some 32" using 1440p resolution create sure you have fun with for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra robust PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of depth in games and we will have to have fun with using adjustments for higher or super level lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.