AOC 24 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- HDMI input for digitally transmitting high-definition video and multichannel audio
- 1 ms response time means speed without the smear for an enhanced gaming experience
- Integrated speakers make it easy to catch up with family, friends and colleagues
- Smart energy-saving features like the W-LED backlight
AOC e2460Sh 24 169 Black WLED 1920x1080 TN 170160 CR10 10001 1ms GtG audio system VESA 100x100 Tilt VGA 1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x E2460SH Monitors Monitors
Black WLED 1920x1080
TN 170160 CR10
10001 1ms GtG audio system VESA 100x100 Tilt VGA 1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x E2460SH Monitors Monitors
AOC 24 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- Duronic Steel DM252 Double Twin LCD LED Desk Mount Monitor Arm Stand Bracket with Tilt and Swivel + 10 Year Warranty - (Adjustable Monitor Arm: Tilt ±45°|Swivel 180°|Rotate 360°)
- MSI 911-7A74-002 PRO VD Kaby Lake Micro Intel B250 DDR4 ATX Motherboard - Black
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
- AOC 21.5 inch LED Monitor HDMI, VGA, Vesa E2270SWHN
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electricity needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one display screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a done offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be alot more attractive. So, to keep away from opting for the earliest one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future acquire your best screen, but from least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing alot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely having most of the splendid content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving option to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of looking from most video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a effective review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the alot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important issue the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking from distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the alot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the existing workspace. Also, dependent on on the size, you also have to take on into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the most controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred photo outstanding as a rule. both thru looking from angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness fina is alot more productive than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always excellent for what uses. TN panels due to alot more productive response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is feasible to acquire a higher fina when playing in a demanding option the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most useful option. You can view alot more code and open different apps from once to take on advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another many other would be to help to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to location one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who help to make use of several purposes from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you perform from 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as purposes and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are alot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring support for systems just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the claim having some 32" having 1440p resolution help to make sure you execute from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly alot more successful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of detail in games and we will pick up to execute having adjustments from huge or mega stage without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For demanding players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.