Asus PB287Q 28 inch Widescreen Ultra HD 4K Monitor (100M:1, 300 cd/m2, 3840 x 2160, 1ms, DP/HDMI/MHL) UK
Asus PB287Q 28 inch Widescreen UK
- See every detail in 28-inch true 4K display with 3840x2160 UHD resolution, 157 pixels per inch and real 10-bit colour
- Get the 4K experience possible with 1 ms GTG response time and 60 Hz refresh rate
- Connect to everything you own with HDMI, HDMI/MHL and displayport
- Adjust for maximum comfort with ergonomic tilt, swivel, pivot and height adjustments plus wall-mount capability
Asus ASUSPB287Q 28 INCHWide filter 169 TN audio speakers 2W x 2Swivel Pivot Height changeable VESA DisplayPort HDMIMHL HDMI Black aka 90LM00R0B02170 PB287Q Monitors Monitors
filter 169 TN SPEAKERS
2W X 2Swivel Pivot Height
changeable VESA DisplayPort HDMIMHL HDMI Black Aka 90LM00R0B02170 PB287Q Monitors Monitors
►Asus PB287Q 28 inch Widescreen super HD 4K Monitor (100M:1, 300 cd/m2, 3840 x 2160, 1ms, DP/HDMI/MHL) UK
Asus PB287Q 28 inch Widescreen Related Posts
- StarTech.com Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Adapter Cable - Video/Audio Cable - Mini-DisplayPort (M) - 20 pin DisplayPort (M) - 1.8 m - Latched
- StarTech 1m Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Adapter Cable ? M/M
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 3M Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- DP to DP Cable,TechRise 2-Meters Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort (DP v1.2) Audio and Video Cable 4K Resolution Supportted-Male to Male
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one filter or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with no counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be alot more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the initially one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later accomplish your ideally suited screen, but by least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you earn of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and various other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing alot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely along with many of the loaded information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use various other aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving solution to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of watching many videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to practica the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with no having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a rapid review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In various other options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the alot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A really make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important point the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the watching distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the alot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the existing workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the many controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred photo good quality as a rule. simultaneously by using watching angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functioning is alot more reliable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to alot more reliable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of various other technologies, it is conceivable to accomplish a higher functioning when playing in a difficult solution the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be exact cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many exciting option. You can view alot more code and open many different apps by once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are superb choices. Another various would be to earn use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or music ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the economy toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who earn use of several programs by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you get the job done by 1080p being able to watch the video with no having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a formidable graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as programs and various other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are alot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest conceivable refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine aid for engineering such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the claim along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution earn sure you play by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly alot more formidable PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater levels of characteristic in games and we will become to play along with adjustments by substantial or super levels with no penalizing the number of frames per second. For difficult players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.