ASUS PB287Q 28 4K 3840x2160 UK
- See every detail in 28-inch true 4K display with 3840x2160 UHD resolution, 157 pixels per inch and real 10-bit colour
- Get the 4K experience possible with 1 ms GTG response time and 60 Hz refresh rate
- Connect to everything you own with HDMI, HDMI/MHL and displayport
- Adjust for maximum comfort with ergonomic tilt, swivel, pivot and height adjustments plus wall-mount capability
Asus ASUSPB287Q 28 INCHWide filter 169 TN audio speakers 2W x 2Swivel Pivot Height varying VESA DisplayPort HDMIMHL HDMI Black aka 90LM00R0B02170 PB287Q Monitors Monitors
filter 169 TN SPEAKERS
2W X 2Swivel Pivot Height
varying VESA DisplayPort HDMIMHL HDMI Black Aka 90LM00R0B02170 PB287Q Monitors Monitors
ASUS PB287Q 28 4K 3840x2160 Related Posts
- StarTech.com 6 ft Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 1.2 Adapter Cable M/M - DisplayPort 4k with HBR2 support - 6 feet Mini DP to DP Cable
- USB C to DisplayPort Cable (4K@60Hz) CHOETECH USB 3.1 Type C (Thunderbolt 3 Compatible) to DP Cable(4ft/1.2m) for Galaxy S8 / S8 Plus, 2016 / 2017 MacBook Pro, MacBook, ChromeBook Pixel etc
- StarTech 1m Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Adapter Cable ? M/M
- Cable Matters Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort (Thunderbolt TM; Port Compatible) to DisplayPort Cable in Black 2m
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideal to use one filter or another. And is that the expertise of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, do the job automation... What is the ideal screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a executed offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different incorporated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be much more attractive. So, to steer transparent of opting for the first one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideal PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would prefer you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future attain your ideal screen, but from least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and other sorts of aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely with a lot of of the hiburan articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use other sorts of aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving solution to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of observing a lot of videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. actually so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to get carry of pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real
No have to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. actually so I will do a short review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other sorts of options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important stage the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to consider a look for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or frequent movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the a lot of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideal photo good quality as a rule. equally by solution of observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness overal is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other sorts of technologies, it is attainable to attain a higher overal when playing in a asking for solution the a lot of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of interesting option. You can view much more code and open many apps from once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are great choices. Another option would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your body to editing video or music recording ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who make use of several apps from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very massive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. actually if you do the job from 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have to have a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as apps and other sorts of tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add much more aid for innovations prefer Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the court case with some 32" with 1440p resolution make sure you carry out from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more amazing PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater amount of characteristic in games and we will get carry of to carry out with adjustments from massive or very amount while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideal right now.