iiyama E2283HS B1 22 ProLite HD UK
- iiyama E2283HS-B1, ProLite. Display diagonal: 54.61 cm (21.5"), Response time: 2 ms, Display brightness: 250 cd/m
- RMS rated power: 2W. Colour of product: Black. Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces compatibility: 100 x 100 mm
- On Screen Display (OSD) languages: CHI (TR), CZE, DEU, DUT, ENG, ESP, FRE, ITA, JPN, POL, RUS. Input voltage: 100 - 240V, Input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.5W
- Adjustable Display
Iiyama Prolite E2283HSB1 22 Black LED LCD HD broad screen TN 2ms 1 x VGA 1 x HDMI 1 x DVID sound system E2283HSB1 Monitors Monitors
Black LED LCD
HD broad screen TN 2ms 1 X VGA 1 X HDMI 1 X DVID sound system E2283HSB1 Monitors Monitors
iiyama E2283HS B1 22 ProLite HD Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one screen or another. And is that the working experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, operate automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be more attractive. So, to avert opting for the to begin with one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The to begin with thing I would have a preference for you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can after gain your best screen, but on least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you create of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and different other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that runs with nicely by means that of a lot of of the multimedia solutions content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by means that of the advent of flat screens began to use different other aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat common but little by little they were giving process to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of watching a lot of movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. by means that of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to carry pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a effective review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In different other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may efficiently think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the watching distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the entire workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go by means that of one of the a lot of controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best impression high-quality as a rule. equally through watching angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a amazing option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of different other technologies, it is potential to gain a higher performance when playing in a challenging process the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of intriguing option. You can view more code and open different apps on once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are amazing choices. Another determination would be to create use of two screens 1080p, being able to site one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the amazing choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who create use of several packages on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you operate on 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as packages and different other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put help support for technologica have a preference for Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by means that of 1080p resolution or as is the condition by means that of some 32" by means that of 1440p resolution create sure you have fun with on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more amazing PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of details in games and we will get carry of to have fun with by means that of adjustments on superior or particularly stage while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.