Acer K222HQL 21 5 inch 100 % HD UK
- 21.5 inch FHD LED monitor
- Acer ComfyView display: Shows widescreen visuals
- 4 ms Response time, 60 Hz refresh rate
- Extensive connectivity: VGA, DVI
- Ergonomic stand tilts from 5 to 25 degrees
Acer K222HQLbid K2 Series customer Monitor 55cm 215 varied 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI DVI wHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay 2 Years Bring In extended warranty TNFilm LED 1920 x 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 ms 200 cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors
55cm 215 varied 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI
DVI WHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay
2 Years Bring In extended warranty TNFilm LED 1920 X 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 Ms 200 Cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors
Acer K222HQL 21 5 inch 100 % HD Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Acer S220HQLBrbd 21.5 inch Widescreen HD LCD TFT Monitor - Black (VGA, DVI, 1920 x 1080, 100000000:1, 5ms, 200cd/m2)
- Acer R271 27-inch Full HD Monitor (IPS panel, 4ms, ZeroFrame, HDMI, DVI)
- DELL 570-AAIR USB Mouse
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideally suited to use one screen or another. And is that the go by using of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the ideally suited screen?
As you know, in the market put there is a finished offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different built in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be extra attractive. So, to steer transparent of opting for the first of all one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideally suited PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually attain your ideally suited screen, but by least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and other sorts of aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that complements nicely by using most of the abundant article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use other sorts of aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving solution to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of enjoying most videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to have pleasure with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No need to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a brief review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other sorts of options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important point the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the enjoying distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the existing workspace. Also, dependent on on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the most controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideally suited photograph high-quality as a rule. each by using enjoying angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is significantly better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to significantly better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other sorts of technologies, it is attainable to attain a higher performance when playing in a strenuous solution the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most helpful option. You can view extra code and open different apps by once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are very good choices. Another alternate would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to put one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or hifi system ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who get use of several plans by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you get the job done by 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need to have a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as plans and other sorts of tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the greatest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we establish guidance for solutions like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the scenario by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution get sure you have fun with by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra effective PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater values of information in games and we will become to have fun with by using adjustments by great or ultra values lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideally suited right now.