Acer K222HQLbid 21.5 inch Monitor (Wide, 5 ms, 100M:1, ACM 200 nits, LED) UK

Acer K222HQLbid 21.5 inch Monitor (Wide, 5 ms, 100M:1, ACM 200 nits, LED) UK
Brand : Acer
Model : UM.WW3EE.005
Product : Products UK

Acer K222HQLbid 21.5 inch Monitor (Wide, 5 ms, 100M:1, ACM 200 nits, LED) - things UK

Acer K222HQLbid 21 5 inch Monitor UK

  • 21.5 inch FHD LED monitor
  • Acer ComfyView display: Shows widescreen visuals
  • 4 ms Response time, 60 Hz refresh rate
  • Extensive connectivity: VGA, DVI
  • Ergonomic stand tilts from 5 to 25 degrees

Acer K222HQLbid K2 Series shopper Monitor 55cm 215 wide 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI DVI wHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay 2 Years Bring In warranty TNFilm LED 1920 x 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 ms 200 cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors


 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products

55cm 215 wide 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI
 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products

DVI WHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay
 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products

2 Years Bring In warranty TNFilm LED 1920 X 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 Ms 200 Cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors

 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products


 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products


 Acer K222HQLbid 215 inch Monitor wide 5 ms 100M1 ACM 200 nits LED HDMI DVI w HDCP Products



►Acer K222HQLbid 21.5 inch Monitor (Wide, 5 ms, 100M:1, ACM 200 nits, LED) UK



Post Tags
acm,200,nits,led,100m1,wide,k222hqlbid,21.5,inch,monitor,acer

Acer K222HQLbid 21 5 inch Monitor Related Posts





Add A Comment

Your name:

Your email:

Your message:




Which PC monitor to choose

When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the top to use one show or another. And is that the working experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.

Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the top screen?

As you know, in the promote there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, especially panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.

With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to stop opting for the first one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the top PC monitor for you?

The first thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward accomplish your best screen, but at least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.

Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and alternative aspects to consider.

Aspect Ratio

The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely through most of the multi-media subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.

Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but through the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving approach to those people of 16:9.

They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of viewing most video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.

But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the especially panoramic displays are becoming popular. through a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.

Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real

No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a fast review to have them good located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.

Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:

1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160

In alternative options that do not become especially panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:

2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440

A priori, one may good think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.

A make a difference of size

If the resolution is an important factor the show size too. Firstly because it conditions the viewing distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed appearance and not those people huge jagged edges.

That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a show size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or repeated movements to see the whole workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.

Panel technologies

And we go through one of the most controversial points. In show themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the top appearance superior quality as a rule. as good through viewing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness effectiveness is better than TN type panels.

Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is probable to accomplish a higher effectiveness when playing in a challenging approach the newest titles.

Screens according to uses

Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which show would be most appropriate according to your uses.

If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most unique option. You can view significantly more code and open multiple apps at once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or especially panoramic panels are good choices. Another alternate would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to destination one in vertical mode.

If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the promote toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who come up with use of several packages at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.

UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in especially great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you succeed at 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as packages and alternative tasks that it performs.

If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest probable refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we construct support for technologica want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.

Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher through 1080p resolution or as is the event through some 32" through 1440p resolution come up with sure you perform at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.

If you have a slightly significantly more effective PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater destination of detail in games and we will obtain to perform through adjustments at great or especially destination with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the top right now.