Acer K222HQLbid 21 5 inch Monitor UK
- 21.5 inch FHD LED monitor
- Acer ComfyView display: Shows widescreen visuals
- 4 ms Response time, 60 Hz refresh rate
- Extensive connectivity: VGA, DVI, HDMI
- Ergonomic stand tilts from 5 to 25 degrees
Acer K222HQLbid K2 Series potentia Monitor 55cm 215 tremendous 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI DVI wHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay 2 Years Bring In warranty TNFilm LED 1920 x 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 ms 200 cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors
55cm 215 tremendous 5ms 100M1 ACM 200nits LED HDMI
DVI WHDCP EUROUK EMEA MPRII Black Acer EcoDisplay
2 Years Bring In warranty TNFilm LED 1920 X 1080 60 Hz 3080KHz5575Hz 5 Ms 200 Cdm2 100M1 Tilt UMWW3EE005 Monitors
Acer K222HQLbid 21 5 inch Monitor Related Posts
- Acer K222HQL 21.5 Inch LED Display Monitor DVI, VGA, 1920 x 1080, Full HD, 5ms, 200cd/m2, VESA Mountable
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Cable Management Sleeve | 5 Pack | White Cable Tidy with 250 cm Total Length | Made From Premium Quality Flexible Neoprene | Baltic Living® Cord Organiser
- Unbranded 500W 12cm Builder PSU - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the finest to use one display or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the finest screen?
As you know, in the advertise there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, seriously panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different incorporated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be more attractive. So, to avert opting for the initial one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the finest PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on obtain your best screen, but by least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and other sorts of aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely by using most of the multi media content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use other sorts of aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving way to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of experiencing most training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the seriously panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No have to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a speedy review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other sorts of options that do not become seriously panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may possibly think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important idea the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the experiencing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to browse for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the circle workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the most controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the finest photo quality as a rule. equally by way of experiencing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness good results is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other sorts of technologies, it is likely to obtain a higher good results when playing in a hard way the latest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most helpful option. You can view more code and open several apps by once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or seriously panoramic panels are superb choices. Another an option would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or sound recording ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who generate use of several uses by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in seriously substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you work by 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have to have a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as uses and other sorts of tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we optimize service for modern advances for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the condition by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution generate sure you play the game by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more robust PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of aspect in games and we will acquire to play the game by using adjustments by substantial or seriously tier while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For hard players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the finest right now.