Dell U2715H 27 inch LCD Monitor UK
- Award-winning performance - since each monitor is tuned at 99% sRGB, the colours look amazing right out of the box. The ultra-wide viewing angle lets you admire the QHD resolution at virtually any angle without losing those gorgeous colours
- More ways to connect - charge, connect and project handheld devices and more with extensive ports
- Reliable and eco-efficient - count on the Dell Premium Panel Guarantee, Advanced Exchange Service and an environmentally conscious design
Dell UltraSharp 27 Monitor U2715H 686cm27 Black UK 210ADSN Monitors Monitors
Dell UltraSharp 27 Monitor U2715H 686cm27 Black UK 210ADSN Monitors Monitors
Dell U2715H 27 inch LCD Monitor Related Posts
- Dell AC511 Wired Active
- Dell U2715H 27-Inch Widescreen IPS LED Monitor
- CHOETECH USB C to DisplayPort Cable (4K@60Hz) CHOETECH USB 3.1 Type C (Thunderbolt 3 Compatible) to DP Cable(4ft/1.2m) for Galaxy S8 / S8 Plus, 2016 / 2017 MacBook Pro, MacBook, ChromeBook Pixel etc
- Dell UltraSharp U2414H 23.8 inch Widescreen IPS LCD Monitor (1920 x 1080, 2M:1, 250 cd/m2, 8 ms, HDMI/DP/mini DP/USB)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the finest to use one screen or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business office automation... What is the finest screen?
As you know, in the market place there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be a great dea attractive. So, to always keep away from opting for the very first one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the finest PC monitor for you?
The very first thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can soon after achieve your great screen, but on least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a great dea than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely with almost all of the multi media subject problem that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving strategy to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of seeing almost all video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. perhaps even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to have fun with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps even so I will do a easy review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the a great dea resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important idea the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a great dea pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to get a look for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the total workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the almost all controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the finest photo top quality as a rule. each unique because of seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is greater than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to greater response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is attainable to achieve a higher efficiency when playing in a arduous strategy the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all significant option. You can view a great dea code and open several apps on once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are good choices. Another answer would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate oneself to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily to choose from toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who generate use of several purposes on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps even if you do the job on 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as purposes and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a great dea attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we produce support for engineering similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance with some 32" with 1440p resolution generate sure you play on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a great dea powerful PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater place of fine detail in games and we will receive to play with adjustments on substantial or particularly place without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the finest right now.