Acer XG270HU omidpx 27 Inch 16 UK
- Screen Size: 27" (69cm); Resolution: 2560x1440 WQHD; Panel: TN; Response Time: 1ms; Refresh Rate: 144Hz; Brightness: 350cd/m; - Contrast ratio: 1000:1 (100,000,000:1 DCR); Connectivity: 1x DVI-D, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort (Display Cable and USB cables included); USB 3.0 Hub; FreeSync Enabled; Speakers: 2x2W Stereo
- Reliable Product
- Brilliant Design
- Adjustable Display
Type:Speakers - stereo, expenditure electricity / Channel:2 Watt, Interfaces:DisplayPort ¦ DVI-D (dual link) ¦ HDMI ¦ new popular music line-in ¦ new popular music line-out, Dimensions & Weight Details:With stand - width: 61.4 cm - depth: 20.6 cm - height: 45.1 cm - weight: 3.86 kg ¦ without having stand - width: 61.4 cm - depth: 3.75 cm - height: 36.8 cm - weight: 3.5 kg, vigor STAR Qualified:Yes, showcase Position Adjustments:Tilt, Tilt Angle:-5/+15, Compliant Standards:MPR II, Cables Included:1 x DVI cable ¦ 1 x DisplayPort cable, bundled Accessories:Stand, Voltage Required:AC 120/230 V, electricity Consumption Sleep:0.37 Watt, electricity Consumption Operational:27.81 Watt, electricity Supply:Internal
Acer XG270HU omidpx 27 Inch 16 Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electricity needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the fantastic to use one filter or another. And is that the working experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the fantastic screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to realize which option would be much more attractive. So, to retain away from opting for the first of all one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the fantastic PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually acquire your a good number of suitable screen, but for least you will realize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that joins nicely having a good number of of the multimedia products content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving technique to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of browsing a good number of video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a rapid review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important level the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the al workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the a good number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the fantastic snapshot of quality as a rule. equally throughout browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness good results is much more reliable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to much more reliable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is likely to acquire a higher good results when playing in a challenging technique the a good number of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of exciting option. You can view much more code and open many different apps for once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are great choices. Another replacement would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to area one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or new popular music ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who make use of several apps for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you succeed for 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a solid graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as apps and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring keep for engineering want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the case having some 32" having 1440p resolution make sure you play for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more solid PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater amount of characteristic in games and we will become to play having adjustments for huge or extremely amount without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the fantastic right now.