AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- QHD resolution
- Backlight TechnologyWLED
- Contrast Ratio10001 500000001 dynamic
- QHD resolution.Power source 100 - 240V 50/60Hz
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort MiniDP to DisplayPort Cable 2K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1105
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 6 Feet Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- ASROCK B250M-HDV S1151 mATX Intel B250 DDR4 Elegant Motherboard - Grey
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electricity needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one filter or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, full HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be even more attractive. So, to continue being away from opting for the first one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards accomplish your appropriate screen, but during least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technology and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely by using a good number of of the multimedia written content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat widespread but little by little they were giving strategy to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that during the time of taking a look during a good number of films you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not during all attractive. in fact so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to experience the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from full HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. in fact so I will do a swift review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important factor the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look during distance and secondly because a full HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit during a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the entire workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the a good number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best graphic high quality as a rule. the two as a result of taking a look during angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is greater than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to greater response times and refresh rates are positioned as a awesome option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is conceivable to accomplish a higher efficiency when playing in a strenuous strategy the a good number of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of attention-grabbing option. You can view even more code and open many different apps during once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are awesome choices. Another option would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the awesome choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily for sale toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who help make use of several plans during the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. in fact if you function during 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a sturdy graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as plans and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add even more assist for technology similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the court case by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution help make sure you execute during an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more sturdy PC during the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of details in games and we will obtain to execute by using adjustments during significant or extremely level with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.