AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- QHD resolution
- Backlight TechnologyWLED
- Contrast Ratio10001 500000001 dynamic
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort MiniDP to DisplayPort Cable 2K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1105
- AMD Ryzen 5 1500X Desktop CPU-AM4(Quad Core,3.5GHz -3.7GHz Turbo,65W)
- GIGABYTE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 OC 8GB ITX PCI-E GRAPHICS CARD
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the top to use one display or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the top screen?
As you know, in the market there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, extra panoramic, entire HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be even more attractive. So, to preserve away from opting for the earliest one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the top PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future obtain your recommended screen, but located at least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely along with almost all of the multimedia system content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving option to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that located at the time of observing almost all video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not located at all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extra panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to get pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from entire HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a rapid review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become extra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important position the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a entire HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit located at a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the around workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the almost all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the top photo outstanding as a rule. the two throughout observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functionality is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is doable to obtain a higher functionality when playing in a challenging option the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all appealing option. You can view even more code and open many apps located at once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extra panoramic panels are superb choices. Another severa would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your self to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who generate use of several plans located at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extra huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you deliver the results located at 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a extra powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as plans and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add assistance for systems for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the instance along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution generate sure you execute located at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more extra powerful PC located at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of information in games and we will get to execute along with adjustments located at huge or extra stage lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the top right now.