AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- QHD resolution
- Backlight TechnologyWLED
- Contrast Ratio10001 500000001 dynamic
- QHD resolution.Power source 100 - 240V 50/60Hz
- Backlight TechnologyWLED. HDCP compatible
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
1000:1 350CD/QM 1MS 2560X1440
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 6 Feet Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- Mini DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8 Meter Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort MiniDP to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black)
- Invision® PC Monitor Arm – Ergonomic Gas-Assisted Full Motion Single Arm Desktop Mount for 17–27" Screens Adjustable Tilt Swivel with Desk Clamp VESA 75x75mm - 100x100mm. Weight 2kg to 6.5kg (MX150)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the almost all beneficial to use one screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the almost all beneficial screen?
As you know, in the market there is a completed offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be extra attractive. So, to prevent opting for the 1st one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the almost all beneficial PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would opt for you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can soon after achieve your suitable screen, but at least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and different aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that performs with nicely with almost all of the unique articles and different content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use different aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving means to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of seeing almost all video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to have pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a speedy review to have them well located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In different options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important place the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the almost all controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the almost all beneficial snapshot quality as a rule. both of these throughout seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a terrific option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of different technologies, it is likely to achieve a higher operation when playing in a strenuous means the almost all current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all interesting option. You can view extra code and open several apps at once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are terrific choices. Another different would be to help to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to site one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the terrific choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who help to make use of several purposes at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you perform at 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as purposes and different tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we contain manage for innovations opt for Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the scenario with some 32" with 1440p resolution help to make sure you participate in at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater site of depth in games and we will have to participate in with adjustments at substantial or super site without penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the almost all beneficial right now.