HP 22cw 21.5 inch LED Monitor (1920 x 1080 Pixel Full HD (FHD) IPS 7 ms HDMI VGA) Black and Silver UK
HP 22cw 21 5 inch LED Monitor UK
- Adjustable Display
►HP 22cw 21.5 inch LED Monitor (1920 x 1080 Pixel complete HD (FHD) IPS 7 ms HDMI VGA) - Black and Silver UK
HP 22cw 21 5 inch LED Monitor Related Posts
- DisplayPort To HDMI Cable, VicTsing 6ft/1.8M Gold Plated DP1.2 DisplayPort to HDMI Cable,1080P Full HD Video For Desktop/ Laptop/ Notebook/ Computer/ PC/ HD TV-box to HDTV/ Monitor/ Projector
- HP 22es 22 inch LED Monitor (1920 x 1080 Pixel Full HD (FHD) IPS 7 ms HDMI VGA) - Black and Silver
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Apple Wireless Keyboard (Certified Refurbished)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the virtually all suitable to use one filter or another. And is that the go by of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the virtually all suitable screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to avert opting for the to start with one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the virtually all suitable PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can soon after acquire your virtually all suitable screen, but in least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you earn of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that complements nicely using virtually all of the multi-media article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving approach to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of observing virtually all video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to go by the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a brief review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A really make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important place the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the general workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the virtually all controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the virtually all suitable snapshot top quality as a rule. every different by observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness capabilities is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is achievable to acquire a higher capabilities when playing in a strenuous approach the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all useful option. You can view significantly more code and open a number of apps in once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are superb choices. Another alternative would be to earn use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate you to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who earn use of several software in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you deliver the results in 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as software and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we incorporate guidance for solutions such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the case using some 32" using 1440p resolution earn sure you consider up in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more highly effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of detail in games and we will become to consider up using adjustments in superior or very degree without penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the virtually all suitable right now.