Eizo ColorEdge CG248 4K 24 Inch UK
- 5 Year Warranty
- Integrated calibration sensor
- Wide colour gamut - 99% Adobe RGB & 98% DCI-P3 colour space
- 3D LUT - Making monitor ideal for video editing
- Digital Uniformity Correction to Delta-E difference of 3 or less across the screen from shipment.
Interfaces:DisplayPort ( HDCP ) ¦ HDMI ( HDCP ) ¦ 3 x USB 3.0, Dimensions & Weight Details:With bear - width: 55.3 cm - depth: 24.5 cm - height: 39.4 cm - weight: 8.5 kg ¦ with out bear - width: 55.3 cm - depth: 6.4 cm - height: 34.5 cm - weight: 5.7 kg, Min jogging Temperature:0 °C, Max jogging Temperature:35 °C, Humidity assortment Operating:20 - 80% (non-condensing), Swivel Angle:344, Rotation Angle:90, Flat Panel Mount Interface:100 x 100 mm, Tilt Angle:-5/+35, present Position Adjustments:Height, pivot (rotation), swivel, tilt, Height Adjustment:150 mm, incorporated Accessories:Detachable hood, Compliant Standards:FCC Class B certified, TUV GS, CB, ICES-003 Class B, TUV Ergo, RoHS, WEEE, GOST-R, cTUVus, VCCI Class B, RCM, Cables Included:1 x DisplayPort cable ¦ 1 x USB cable ¦ miniature DisplayPort-DisplayPort cable, energy Consumption bear by:9 Watt, energy Consumption Operational:52 Watt, On / Off Switch:Yes, Voltage Required:AC 120/230 V ( 50/60 Hz ), incorporated Software:EIZO ColorNavigator
Eizo ColorEdge CG248 4K 24 Inch Related Posts
- Lexar Professional USB 3.0 Dual Slot Reader Compatible with SD and UDMA Flash Memory Cards-LRW400U
- Crucial MX300 1TB SATA 2.5 Inch Internal Solid State Drive - CT1050MX300SSD1
- EIZO CS2420 24-Inch LCD/LED Monitor - Black
- LaCie Rugged 2TB Thunderbolt & USB 3.0 Portable 2.5 inch External Hard Drive for PC and Mac
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one display screen or another. And is that the think of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different enclosed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to comprehend which option would be even more attractive. So, to preserve clean of opting for the first one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on accomplish your ideally suited screen, but in least you will comprehend what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely by using many of the multimedia system article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving process to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of visiting many films you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. in fact so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That aids you to such as the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. in fact so I will do a speedy review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may very well think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important factor the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the whole workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the many controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred impression high-quality as a rule. both thru visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness overal is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is feasible to accomplish a higher overal when playing in a asking for process the many recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many useful option. You can view even more code and open numerous apps in once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are very good choices. Another optionally available would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who produce use of several programs in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. in fact if you operate in 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a potent graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as programs and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we create help support for technologica such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution produce sure you engage in in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more potent PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of outline in games and we will pick up to engage in by using adjustments in higher or ultra level with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.