ASUS VC279H 27 inch entire HD Widescreen UK
- In-Plane Switching technology panel with LED backlight in frameless and slim design
- Advanced Eye Care feature with Blue Light filter and Flicker-Free
- Embedded wall mount hole for multiple using scenario
250 CD/M 5MS VGA DVI HDMI
250 CD/M 5MS VGA DVI HDMI
ASUS VC279H 27 inch entire HD Widescreen Related Posts
- Proper Dual Arm Cantilever Desk Monitor Mount for 13" 19" 23" 24" 27" and 32"
- VonHaus Monitor Mount Arm for 13"-27" Computer Screens - Desk Mounting VESA Bracket - Tilt, Rotate & Swivel Functions - Max 100x100
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- ASUS VC239H Monitor, FHD (1920x1080), IPS, Frameless, Flicker Free, Low Light, TUV Certified, 23 inch - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one tv screen or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, entire HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to remain obvious of opting for the first one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on accomplish your ideally suited screen, but at least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that joins nicely by the majority of of the multimedia systems articles and some other content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while people of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving method to people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of seeing the majority of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows for you to practica the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from entire HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a quickly review to have them good located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may good think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important issue the tv screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a entire HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a tv screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by one of the the majority of controversial points. In tv screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred photograph good quality as a rule. possibly by seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is a lot more reliable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always great for what uses. TN panels due to a lot more reliable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a excellent option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is probable to accomplish a higher genera when playing in a difficult method the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which tv screen would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of intriguing option. You can view a lot more code and open multiple apps at once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are excellent choices. Another replacement would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to location one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate oneself to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the excellent choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for people who get use of several programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra accelerated definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you function at 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a ultra powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as programs and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put service for modern advances for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by 1080p resolution or as is the instance by some 32" by 1440p resolution get sure you enjoy at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more ultra powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater amount of characteristic in games and we will acquire to enjoy by adjustments at accelerated or ultra amount without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For difficult players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.