ASUS VC239H Monitor, FHD (1920x1080), IPS, Frameless, Flicker Free, Low Light, TUV Certified, 23 inch Black UK
ASUS VC239H Monitor FHD 1920x1080 UK
- In-Plane Switching technology panel with LED backlight in a slim and frameless design
- Enhanced eye care features with Blue Light Filter and Flicker free
- Embedded wall mount hole
ASUS VC239H LED monitor 23 23 viewable 1920 x 1080 filled HD IPS 250 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI DVID VGA audio system black 90LM01E0B02170 Monitors Monitors
►ASUS VC239H Monitor, FHD (1920x1080), IPS, Frameless, Flicker Free, Low Light, TUV Certified, 23 inch - Black UK
ASUS VC239H Monitor FHD 1920x1080 Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Duronic Steel DM252 Double Twin LCD LED Desk Mount Monitor Arm Stand Bracket with Tilt and Swivel + 10 Year Warranty - (Adjustable Monitor Arm: Tilt ±45°|Swivel 180°|Rotate 360°)
- AMD YD1200BBAEBOX Ryzen 3 1200 CPU with Wraith Stealth Cooler - Silver
- VonHaus Fully Adjustable Triple Three Arm LCD LED Monitor Desk Mount Bracket Stand For 13-27" Screens with 45° Tilt & 180° Swivel
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the capability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the nearly all reliable to use one show or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the nearly all reliable screen?
As you know, in the advertise there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different enclosed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to vacation away from opting for the initially one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the nearly all reliable PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the street gain your recommended screen, but with least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that encounters nicely along with nearly all of the hiburan article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving solution to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of browsing nearly all video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to have enjoyment with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a swift review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important idea the show size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed look and feel and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a show size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the nearly all controversial points. In show themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the nearly all reliable look and feel superior as a rule. each as a result of browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functionality is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is potential to gain a higher functionality when playing in a asking for solution the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which show would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all useful option. You can view a lot more code and open a selection of apps with once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are very good choices. Another other would be to help to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to destination one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or new music and songs ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the advertise toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who help to make use of several software programs with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really high definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you give good results with 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as software programs and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the max refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we build assist for technologica enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the predicament along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution help to make sure you execute with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more powerful PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater levels of aspect in games and we will find to execute along with adjustments with high or really levels with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the nearly all reliable right now.