ASUS VC239H Monitor, FHD (1920x1080), IPS, Frameless, Flicker Free, Low Light, TUV Certified, 23 inch Blue UK
ASUS VC239H Monitor FHD 1920x1080 UK
- In-Plane Switching technology panel with LED backlight in a slim and frameless design
- Enhanced eye care features with Blue Light Filter and Flicker free
- Embedded wall mount hole
ASUS VC239H LED monitor 23 23 viewable 1920 x 1080 comprehensive HD IPS 250 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI DVID VGA speakers black 90LM01E0B02170 Monitors Monitors
23 23 Viewable 1920
X 1080 comprehensive HD IPS
250 Cdm2 10001 5 Ms HDMI DVID VGA speakers Black 90LM01E0B02170 Monitors Monitors
►ASUS VC239H Monitor, FHD (1920x1080), IPS, Frameless, Flicker Free, Low Light, TUV Certified, 23 inch - Blue UK
ASUS VC239H Monitor FHD 1920x1080 Related Posts
- Y Splitter Mains Kettle Twin Power Lead PC & Monitor
- Duronic Steel DM252 Double Twin LCD LED Desk Mount Monitor Arm Stand Bracket with Tilt and Swivel + 10 Year Warranty - (Adjustable Monitor Arm: Tilt ±45°|Swivel 180°|Rotate 360°)
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 1.8m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the perfect to use one display or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, give good results automation... What is the perfect screen?
As you know, in the current market there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to realize which option would be much more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the earliest one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the perfect PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would opt for you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the avenue attain your suitable screen, but in least you will realize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely with the help of almost all of the multi media material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the help of the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving option to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of browsing almost all clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. with the help of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to have pleasurable with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a effective review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important factor the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the existing workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go with the help of one of the almost all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the perfect photo high-quality as a rule. equally through browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is practical to attain a higher operation when playing in a hard option the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all significant option. You can view much more code and open several apps in once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are good choices. Another alternative would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or favorite songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily for sale toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who get use of several apps in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you give good results in 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as apps and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we model guidance for modern advances opt for Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with the help of 1080p resolution or as is the claim with the help of some 32" with the help of 1440p resolution get sure you execute in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more highly effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of details in games and we will secure to execute with the help of adjustments in significant or mega degree without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For hard players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the perfect right now.