Philips lines 243V5LHSB 23 UK
- Display diagonal: 23.6", Display brightness: 250 cd/m, Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels. Color of product: Black, Heavy metals free: Hg (mercury), Pb (lead
- Mean time between failures (MTBF): 30.000 h. Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces: 100 x 100 mm, LED indicators: Stand-by, Operation
- AC input voltage: 100-240 V, AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.5 W
- Adjustable Display
Philips Vline 243V5LHSB LED monitor 236 1920 x 1080 FullHD 250 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI DVID VGA textured black black hairline 243V5LHSB00 Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 236 1920
X 1080 FullHD 250
Cdm2 10001 5 Ms HDMI DVID VGA Textured Black Black Hairline 243V5LHSB00 Monitors Monitors
Philips lines 243V5LHSB 23 Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the a lot of successful to use one panel or another. And is that the proficiency of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the a lot of successful screen?
As you know, in the marketplace there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, top HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with no counting the different incorporated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the 1st one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the a lot of successful PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later secure your ideal screen, but with least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely having a lot of of the multi media content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving means to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of taking a look with a lot of films you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to proficiency the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with no having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from top HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a fast review to have them well located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important point the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look with distance and secondly because a top HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the complete workspace. Also, depending upon on the size, you also have to take on into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the a lot of controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the a lot of successful graphic superior quality as a rule. equally by taking a look with angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functioning is significantly more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to significantly more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is achievable to secure a higher functioning when playing in a stressful means the a lot of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of appealing option. You can view significantly more code and open multiple apps with once to take on advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are very good choices. Another substitute would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or noise recording ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who make use of several applications with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you succeed with 1080p being able to watch the video with no having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as applications and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the largest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we insert preserve for systems just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the predicament having some 32" having 1440p resolution make sure you enjoy with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more successful PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater quantities of feature in games and we will secure to enjoy having adjustments with significant or particularly quantities with no penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the a lot of successful right now.