ASUS MB169B 15 6 transportable USB UK
- 15.6-inch full HD portable USB-powered monitor with a single USB 3.0 cable for power and data transmission
- One of the World's slimmest and lightest USB monitor with a sleek and metallic finish
- Auto-rotating display bundled with the ASUS smart case a two-way adjustable stand and protective sleeve
ASUS MB169B LED monitor 156 transportable 1920 x 1080 FullHD IPS 200 cdm2 14 ms USB black silver MB169B Monitors Monitors
1920 X 1080 FullHD IPS 200 Cdm2 14 Ms USB Black Silver MB169B Monitors Monitors
ASUS MB169B 15 6 transportable USB Related Posts
- Anker Portable Multi-Angle Stand for Tablets, e-readers and Smartphones, Compatible with iPhone X / 8 / 8 Plus, iPhone, iPad, Samsung Galaxy / Tab, Google Nexus, HTC, LG, Nokia Lumia, OnePlus and More
- UGREEN Micro USB Cable 1m,USB 3.0 A to Micro B Y Cable with USB 2.0 Charge Cord for Western Digital,Seagate,WD,Clickfree,Toshiba,Elements,Samsung Portable Hard Drives and Samsung Galaxy S5, Galaxy Note 3, Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, Nokia Lumia 2520,Pentax camera etc
- AmazonBasics USB Cable - 3.0 A-Male to Micro B (2.7 m / 9 Feet)
- ASUS ZenScreen MB16AC 15.6-Inch USB Type-C IPS FHD 1920 x 1080 Portable Monitor - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most suitable to use one monitor or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the most suitable screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be extra attractive. So, to avoid opting for the primary one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most suitable PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would for instance you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward get carry of your ideal screen, but with least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely with a good number of of the hiburan material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while the of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving solution to the of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of taking a look with a good number of video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a swift review to have them good located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make any difference of size
If the resolution is an important level the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look with distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not the huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the complete workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the a good number of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most suitable persona excellent as a rule. just about every by means of taking a look with angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a awesome option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is practical to get carry of a higher operation when playing in a stressful solution the a good number of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of useful option. You can view extra code and open many different apps with once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are awesome choices. Another other would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or new music ultra-widescreen displays are the awesome choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the who make use of several functions with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you get the job done with 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as functions and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest practical refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we strengthen service for modern advances for instance Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the condition with some 32" with 1440p resolution make sure you execute with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra effective PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of aspect in games and we will get carry of to execute with adjustments with superior or extremely tier without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most suitable right now.