Asus VE248HR 24 Inch LED Monitor UK
- 24 inch full HD monitor with 1 ms (GTG) quick response time to eliminate ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
- Extensive connectivity including HDMI, DVI-D and D-sub ports; plus 1 W stereo speakers
ASUS VE248HR 24 INCH Monitor TN 1920 x 1080 1ms HDMI 90LMC3001Q02231C Monitors Monitors
INCH Monitor TN 1920 X 1080 1ms HDMI 90LMC3001Q02231C Monitors Monitors
Asus VE248HR 24 Inch LED Monitor Related Posts
- ASUS LGA 1151 STRIX GAMING Intel Z270 ATX Motherboard - Black
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 Vengeance LPX 8 GB (2x4 GB) DDR4 2666 MHz C16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
- ASUS LGA 1151 TUF MARK 2 Intel Z270 ATX Motherboard - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electrica needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one display or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business office automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the market there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this devoid of counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the to begin with one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The to begin with thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards gain your a lot of suitable screen, but by least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely using a lot of of the hiburan articles and alternative content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving means to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of looking by a lot of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to have excitement with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration devoid of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a rapid review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may very well think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important issue the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking by distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the a lot of controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best image good quality as a rule. both as a result of looking by angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness results is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a awesome option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is probable to gain a higher results when playing in a challenging means the a lot of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of significant option. You can view a lot more code and open many apps by once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are awesome choices. Another substitute would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to site one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or new music ultra-widescreen displays are the awesome choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who get use of several functions by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega amplified definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you do the job by 1080p being able to watch the video devoid of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as functions and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the finest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add a lot more guidance for technologica enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the court case using some 32" using 1440p resolution get sure you engage in by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more highly effective PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater grade of fine detail in games and we will receive to engage in using adjustments by amplified or mega grade devoid of penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.