ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor (1 ms, 1920 x 1080, HDMI, DVI D, VGA, 250 cd/m2) Black UK

ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor (1 ms, 1920 x 1080, HDMI, DVI-D, VGA, 250 cd/m2) - Black UK
Brand : ASUS
Model : VS248HR
Product : Products UK

ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor (1 ms, 1920 x 1080, HDMI, DVI-D, VGA, 250 cd/m2) - Black - items UK

ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor UK

  • 50,000,000:1 ASUS smart contrast ratio. Asus support line: 01442-265548 for queries related to the product.
  • Full HD 1080p (1920 x 1080) support
  • Quick response time of 1 ms (GTG) eliminates ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
  • Aspect control function allows users to select a preferred display mode
  • Splendid video Intelligence technology optimises video performance and image fidelity

Asus VS248HR LED monitor 24 1920 x 1080 comprehensive HD 1080p 250 cdm 1 ms HDMI DVID VGA black 90LME3301Q02231C Monitors Monitors


 ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor 1 ms 1920 x 1080 HDMI DVI D VGA 250 cd m2 Black Products

LED Monitor
 ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor 1 ms 1920 x 1080 HDMI DVI D VGA 250 cd m2 Black Products

24 1920 X
 ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor 1 ms 1920 x 1080 HDMI DVI D VGA 250 cd m2 Black Products

1080 comprehensive HD 1080p 250 Cdm 1 Ms HDMI DVID VGA Black 90LME3301Q02231C Monitors Monitors

 ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor 1 ms 1920 x 1080 HDMI DVI D VGA 250 cd m2 Black Products


 ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor 1 ms 1920 x 1080 HDMI DVI D VGA 250 cd m2 Black Products



►ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor (1 ms, 1920 x 1080, HDMI, DVI-D, VGA, 250 cd/m2) - Black UK



Post Tags
vga,dvi-d,250,cdm2,black,-,hdmi,1080,inch,vs248hr,gaming,monitor,1920,asus

ASUS VS248HR 24 inch Gaming Monitor Related Posts





Add A Comment

Your name:

Your email:

Your message:




Which PC monitor to choose

When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideally suited to use one filter or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.

Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the ideally suited screen?

As you know, in the sector there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this not having counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.

With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be much more attractive. So, to keep well-defined of opting for the first one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideally suited PC monitor for you?

The first thing I would give preference to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards pick up your ideally suited screen, but from least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.

Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and other aspects to consider.

Aspect Ratio

The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fulfils nicely using virtually all of the media content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.

Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat common but little by little they were giving technique to these of 16:9.

They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of observing virtually all clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.

But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to enjoy the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration not having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.

Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real

No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a effective review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones presented according to the aspect ratio.

Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:

1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160

In other options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:

2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440

A priori, one may perhaps think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.

A subject of size

If the resolution is an important factor the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not these huge jagged edges.

That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to appear for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the complete workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.

Panel technologies

And we go using one of the virtually all controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideally suited image leve as a rule. from the same time by observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness effectiveness is much better than TN type panels.

Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a terrific option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is probable to pick up a higher effectiveness when playing in a difficult technique the virtually all recent titles.

Screens according to uses

Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.

If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all exciting option. You can view much more code and open many different apps from once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are terrific choices. Another option would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to location one in vertical mode.

If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the terrific choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who help make use of several apps from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.

UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you get the job done from 1080p being able to watch the video not having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as apps and other tasks that it performs.

If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we grow aid for solutions give preference to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.

Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the predicament using some 32" using 1440p resolution help make sure you execute from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.

If you have a slightly much more robust PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of do the job in games and we will pick up to execute using adjustments from higher or super tier not having penalizing the number of frames per second. For difficult players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideally suited right now.