AOC 23 8 inch IPS extremely Thin Monitor UK
- Display diagonal: 24", Display brightness: 350 cd/m, Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels.
- RMS rated power: 4 W. Color of product: Black. Swivel angle range: -165 - 165, Tilt angle: -5 - 22, Height adjustment: 5.12" (13 cm).
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V, AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.31 W
- Monitor Line: Style-line
- It is not wall mountable
AOC pattern I2481FXH LCD monitor 238 1920 x 1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 cdm2 10001 4 ms 2xHDMI VGA black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
238 1920 X
1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 Cdm2 10001 4 Ms 2xHDMI VGA Black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
AOC 23 8 inch IPS extremely Thin Monitor Related Posts
- CSL - 1m Full HD Mini Displayport to HDMI cable with audio transmission | certified | for Apple / MAC, iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air | black
- CSL - NEW 1m Full HD Mini Displayport to HDMI cable with audio transmission | certified | for Apple / MAC, iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air | white
- Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Set, (Long Battery Life, Full Size & Ultra Thin, 12 Multimedia Entertainment Keys) Patuoxun Ergonomic Chiclet Design Anti-spill 2.4G Cordless Keyboard & Mouse Combo with Nano USB Reveiver for Desktop PC Mac OS Windows Linus -- UK Layout
- Microsoft Wireless Desktop 900 Keyboard and Mouse - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the a large number of suitable to use one filter or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the a large number of suitable screen?
As you know, in the marketplace there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to stop opting for the first of all one you see or the one that a large number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the a large number of suitable PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently acquire your a large number of suitable screen, but from least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you create of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely having a large number of of the multi media articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while the ones of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving means to the ones of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of browsing a large number of online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a rapid review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the ones of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a large number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important place the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed appearance and not the ones huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the entire workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the a large number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the a large number of suitable appearance high-quality as a rule. together by browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is probable to acquire a higher performance when playing in a tense means the a large number of recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the subject of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a large number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a large number of fascinating option. You can view significantly more code and open numerous apps from once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another option would be to create use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate you to editing video or good recording ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the ones who create use of several apps from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely good sized definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you operate from 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a extremely powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as apps and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add help and support for technologies just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the court case having some 32" having 1440p resolution create sure you execute from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more extremely powerful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of characteristic in games and we will acquire to execute having adjustments from good sized or extremely degree lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the a large number of suitable right now.