AOC 23 8 inch IPS ultra Thin Monitor UK
- Display diagonal: 24", Display brightness: 350 cd/m, Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels.
- RMS rated power: 4 W. Color of product: Black. Swivel angle range: -165 - 165, Tilt angle: -5 - 22, Height adjustment: 5.12" (13 cm).
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V, AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.31 W
- Monitor Line: Style-line
- Adjustable Display
AOC style and design I2481FXH LCD monitor 238 1920 x 1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 cdm2 10001 4 ms 2xHDMI VGA black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
238 1920 X
1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 Cdm2 10001 4 Ms 2xHDMI VGA Black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
AOC 23 8 inch IPS ultra Thin Monitor Related Posts
- CSL - 1m Full HD Mini Displayport to HDMI cable with audio transmission | certified | for Apple / MAC, iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air | black
- Regular Black Glass Monitor & TV Screen Display Stand Riser With Adjustable Legs Green House
- JOYACCESS Wireless Keyboards Combo Full-size Whisper-quiet Compact Keyboards and Mouse Combo (UK layout)-Silver
- ASUS PCE-AC51 Dual-Band Wireless-AC750 PCI-E Adapter, 2x Detachable Antenna
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the nearly all beneficial to use one panel or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, position of succeed automation... What is the nearly all beneficial screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be even more attractive. So, to steer crysta of opting for the first one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the nearly all beneficial PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the avenue achieve your appropriate screen, but by least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that work with nicely throughout nearly all of the multimedia articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but throughout the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while the ones of 16:10 were somewhat common but little by little they were giving solution to the ones of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of looking by nearly all video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. throughout a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a quick review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the ones of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important issue the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking by distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not the ones huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to search for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go throughout one of the nearly all controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the nearly all beneficial impression high-quality as a rule. every different throughout looking by angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functioning is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is practical to achieve a higher functioning when playing in a arduous solution the nearly all popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the matter of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all appealing option. You can view even more code and open different apps by once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are good choices. Another remedy would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your self to editing video or noise experience ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having reachable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the ones who try to make use of several apps by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you succeed by 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as apps and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add even more assistance for technologies for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher throughout 1080p resolution or as is the scenario throughout some 32" throughout 1440p resolution try to make sure you carry out by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more amazing PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater high-quality of fine detail in games and we will get outlet of to carry out throughout adjustments by substantial or ultra high-quality without penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the nearly all beneficial right now.