AOC 23 8 inch IPS really Thin Monitor UK
- Display diagonal: 24", Display brightness: 350 cd/m, Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels.
- RMS rated power: 4 W. Color of product: Black. Swivel angle range: -165 - 165, Tilt angle: -5 - 22, Height adjustment: 5.12" (13 cm).
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V, AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz, Power consumption (standby): 0.31 W
- Monitor Line: Style-line
- Adjustable Display
- Visible Screen size : 527.04x296.46 mm, Pixel pitch : 0.2745
AOC model I2481FXH LCD monitor 238 1920 x 1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 cdm2 10001 4 ms 2xHDMI VGA black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
238 1920 X
1080 FullHD AHIPS 250 Cdm2 10001 4 Ms 2xHDMI VGA Black I2481FXH Monitors Monitors
AOC 23 8 inch IPS really Thin Monitor Related Posts
- CSL - 1m Full HD Mini Displayport to HDMI cable with audio transmission | certified | for Apple / MAC, iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air | black
- Microsoft Wireless Desktop 900 Keyboard and Mouse - Black
- LG 27UD58 27 inch 4K UHD IPS Monitor (3840 x 2160, 2x HDMI, DisplayPort, 250 cd/m2, 5ms, AMD Freesync)
- AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Desktop CPU - AM4/Quad Core/3.2GHz – 3.4GHz Turbo/8MB/65W
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the the majority of useful to use one display or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the the majority of useful screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a finished offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be much more attractive. So, to stay in very clear of opting for the first of all one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the the majority of useful PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently get to your suitable screen, but at least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely with the majority of of the multi media information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving method to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of taking a look at the majority of training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. actually so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to obtain pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. actually so I will do a fast review to have them certainly located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important point the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look at distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring certainly is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the basic workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the the majority of controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the the majority of useful graphic superior as a rule. both of some of those by using taking a look at angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a terrific option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is potential to get to a higher genera when playing in a tense method the the majority of up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be exact cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of appealing option. You can view much more code and open an array of apps at once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are terrific choices. Another alternate would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate yourself to editing video or music and songs ultra-widescreen displays are the terrific choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who produce use of several programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. actually if you operate at 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a formidable graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as certainly as programs and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we incorporate help and support for know-how want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the situation with some 32" with 1440p resolution produce sure you perform at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more formidable PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of detail in games and we will obtain to perform with adjustments at huge or really degree while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the the majority of useful right now.