AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K UK
- Display resolution: 3840 x 2160 p
- Headphone connectivity: 3.5 mm
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V
- Power consumption (standby): 0.5 W
AOC Featured U2879VF LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K 300 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort black silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 28
3840 X 2160 4K
300 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort Black Silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K Related Posts
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 3M Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DP TO DP Cable,TechRise 2-Meters Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable Converter Adapter V1.2, 2K Resolution Supportted -Male to Male
- CSL - 1m Full HD mini DisplayPort (miniDP) to DisplayPort (DP) cable | certified | video / audio transmission | PC & MAC, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air etc | black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the finest to use one monitor or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the finest screen?
As you know, in the current market there is a executed offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, highest feasible HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different granted technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be even more attractive. So, to continue to keep obvious of opting for the initially one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the finest PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently achieve your recommended screen, but at least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely by means of nearly all of the multimedia system information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by means of the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving strategy to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of experiencing nearly all video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by means of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to have entertaining with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from highest feasible HD to 4K real
No have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a brief review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may effectively think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make any difference of size
If the resolution is an important position the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the experiencing distance and secondly because a highest feasible HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the complete workspace. Also, dependent on on the size, you also have to consider into account the resolution.
And we go by means of one of the nearly all controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the finest persona outstanding as a rule. simultaneously by means of experiencing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always great for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is feasible to achieve a higher operation when playing in a tense strategy the nearly all recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all appealing option. You can view even more code and open many different apps at once to consider advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another substitute would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate you to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who come up with use of several software programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you do the job at 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have a ultra powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as software programs and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we incorporate help support for modern advances such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by means of 1080p resolution or as is the instance by means of some 32" by means of 1440p resolution come up with sure you carry out at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more ultra powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of depth in games and we will get to carry out by means of adjustments at superior or ultra level while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the finest right now.