AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K UK
- Display resolution: 3840 x 2160 p
- Headphone connectivity: 3.5 mm
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V
- Power consumption (standby): 0.5 W
AOC Featured U2879VF LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K 300 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort black silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 28
3840 X 2160 4K
300 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort Black Silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K Related Posts
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 3M Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DP TO DP Cable,TechRise 2-Meters Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable Converter Adapter V1.2, 2K Resolution Supportted -Male to Male
- CSL - 1m Full HD mini DisplayPort (miniDP) to DisplayPort (DP) cable | certified | video / audio transmission | PC & MAC, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air etc | black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one television screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the marketplace there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, highest potential HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with no counting the different built in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be extra attractive. So, to reside away from opting for the very first one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The very first thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future get carry of your many suitable screen, but for least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and different aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely having many of the multimedia articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use different aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving means to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of watching many videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to get carry of pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with no having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from highest potential HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a easy review to have them well located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In different options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important position the television screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the watching distance and secondly because a highest potential HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed picture and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a television screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the many controversial points. In television screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best picture top quality as a rule. every one as a result of watching angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness good results is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a excellent option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of different technologies, it is potential to get carry of a higher good results when playing in a arduous means the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which television screen would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many intriguing option. You can view extra code and open many apps for once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are excellent choices. Another option would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your body to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the excellent choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having for sale toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who come up with use of several applications for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega sizeable definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you do the job for 1080p being able to watch the video with no having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a potent graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as applications and different tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add support for know-how just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the situation having some 32" having 1440p resolution come up with sure you perform for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra potent PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of fine detail in games and we will get carry of to perform having adjustments for sizeable or mega tier with no penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.