AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K UK
- Display resolution: 3840 x 2160 p. Refresh rate 60Hz
- Headphone connectivity: 3.5 mm
- AC input voltage: 110-240 V
- Power consumption (standby): 0.5 W
- Features plug and play, Multiview, i-Menu, e-Saver, Screen+ and Vesa Wallmount
AOC Featured U2879VF LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K 300 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort black silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 28
3840 X 2160 4K
300 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI MHL VGA DVID DisplayPort Black Silver U2879VF Monitors Monitors
AOC U2879VF 28 Inches 4K Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort 4K@60Hz 3M Cable, Benfei Mini DP(Thunderbolt Compatible) to Display Port Adapter Male to Male Gold-Plated Cord for MacBook, Lenovo, Dell and other Brand
- VonHaus Dual Monitor Stand for 13-32” Screens | Double Arm Desk Mount Bracket | Ergonomic ±180° Tilt, 360° Rotation & Twin 360° Swivel Arms | VESA Dimensions: 75x75 - 100x100
- CHOETECH USB C to DisplayPort Cable (4K@60Hz) CHOETECH USB 3.1 Type C (Thunderbolt 3 Compatible) to DP Cable(4ft/1.2m) for Galaxy S8 / S8 Plus, 2016 / 2017 MacBook Pro, MacBook, ChromeBook Pixel etc
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the the majority of beneficial to use one display or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the the majority of beneficial screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a full offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, full HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be even more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the earliest one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the the majority of beneficial PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward achieve your the majority of suitable screen, but in least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and additional aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely by using the majority of of the multi-media articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving technique to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of enjoying the majority of video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to experience the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from full HD to 4K real
No need to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a effective review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In additional options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A issue of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the enjoying distance and secondly because a full HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the general workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the the majority of controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the the majority of beneficial snapshot high-quality as a rule. the two throughout enjoying angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functioning is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is feasible to achieve a higher functioning when playing in a arduous technique the the majority of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of exciting option. You can view even more code and open distinct apps in once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are good choices. Another substitute would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or music and songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who come up with use of several functions in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you do the job in 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need to have a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as functions and additional tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring assist for technologica want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution come up with sure you engage in in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of depth in games and we will get manage of to engage in by using adjustments in higher or particularly tier with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the the majority of beneficial right now.