ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK

ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK
Brand : ASUS
Model : 90LM01M3-B01170
Product : Products UK

ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) - products and services UK

ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 UK

  • 27 inch full HD monitor with 1 ms (GTG) quick response time to eliminate ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
  • ASUS-exclusive GamePlus provides crosshair and timer function for better gaming experience
  • The TÜV Rheinland-certified ASUS flicker-free and low blue light technologies
  • Extensive connectivity including, dual HDMI and D-sub ports; plus 2 W stereo speakers

Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors


 ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor 1 ms HDMI D Sub Low Blue gentle Flicker Free TUV Certified Products


 ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor 1 ms HDMI D Sub Low Blue gentle Flicker Free TUV Certified Products


 ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor 1 ms HDMI D Sub Low Blue gentle Flicker Free TUV Certified Products

Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors

 ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor 1 ms HDMI D Sub Low Blue gentle Flicker Free TUV Certified Products


 ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor 1 ms HDMI D Sub Low Blue gentle Flicker Free TUV Certified Products



►ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK



Post Tags
light,blue,low,flicker,free,certified,tuv,d-sub,hdmi,fhd,inch,vp278h,1920,1080,monitor,gaming,asus

ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 Related Posts





Add A Comment

Your name:

Your email:

Your message:




Which PC monitor to choose

When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the the vast majority of beneficial to use one panel or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.

Video games, video editing, office automation... What is the the vast majority of beneficial screen?

As you know, in the market there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, especially panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different delivered technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.

With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be far more attractive. So, to avert opting for the earliest one you see or the one that the vast majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the the vast majority of beneficial PC monitor for you?

The earliest thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the street receive your suitable screen, but with least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.

Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and alternative aspects to consider.

Aspect Ratio

The aspect ratio is nothing far more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely with the vast majority of of the multi media content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.

Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving option to those people of 16:9.

They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of taking a look with the vast majority of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.

But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the especially panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to appreciate the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.

Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real

No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a easy review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.

Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:

1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160

In alternative options that do not become especially panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:

2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440

A priori, one might possibly think that the far more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the vast majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.

A really make a difference of size

If the resolution is an important place the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look with distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the far more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not those people huge jagged edges.

That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the whole workspace. Also, depending upon on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.

Panel technologies

And we go with one of the the vast majority of controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the the vast majority of beneficial photograph of quality as a rule. both of those people by means of taking a look with angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness capabilities is far more beneficial than TN type panels.

Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to far more beneficial response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is likely to receive a higher capabilities when playing in a requiring option the the vast majority of up-to-date titles.

Screens according to uses

Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be the vast majority of appropriate according to your uses.

If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the vast majority of significant option. You can view far more code and open diverse apps with once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or especially panoramic panels are great choices. Another alternate would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.

If you dedicate one self to editing video or appear practica ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having reachable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who produce use of several software programs with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.

UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in especially significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you get the job done with 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as software programs and alternative tasks that it performs.

If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are far more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we construct assistance for technologies such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.

Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the instance with some 32" with 1440p resolution produce sure you perform with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.

If you have a slightly far more highly effective PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of information in games and we will receive to perform with adjustments with significant or especially stage without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the the vast majority of beneficial right now.