ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK
ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 UK
- 27 inch full HD monitor with 1 ms (GTG) quick response time to eliminate ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
- ASUS-exclusive GamePlus provides crosshair and timer function for better gaming experience
- The TÜV Rheinland-certified ASUS flicker-free and low blue light technologies
- Extensive connectivity including, dual HDMI and D-sub ports; plus 2 W stereo speakers
Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors
Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors
►ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK
ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Invision® PC Monitor Arm – Ergonomic Gas-Assisted Full Motion Single Arm Desktop Mount for 17–27" Screens Adjustable Tilt Swivel with Desk Clamp VESA 75x75mm - 100x100mm. Weight 2kg to 6.5kg (MX150)
- ADMI GAMING PC: Intel Core I7 7700 3.6Ghz Quad Core CPU / GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 Graphics Card / 16GB 2400MHz DDR4 RAM / 1TB HDD / 500W PSU / Game Max Falcon Case / Windows 10
- ADMI GTX 1060 GAMING PC: High-End VR Ready Gaming Desktop Computer: Intel Core i5 7400 3.5Ghz Quad Core CPU / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 4K VR Ready Graphics Card / 8GB 2400MHz DDR4 RAM / 1TB Hard Drive / 500W PSU Bronze Rated / HD Audio / USB 3.0 / HDMI/4K Ultra HD Support / VR / Oculus Support / Game Max Falcon Gaming Case - Blue LED / DVDRW 24x / Pre-Installed with Windows 10
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the capability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the a good number of beneficial to use one television screen or another. And is that the know-how of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, company automation... What is the a good number of beneficial screen?
As you know, in the market there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be extra attractive. So, to stop opting for the 1st one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the a good number of beneficial PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later become your suitable screen, but on least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing extra than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely having a good number of of the multi-media content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while al of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving solution to al of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of viewing a good number of videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to become pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a fast review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, al of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the extra resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important level the television screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the viewing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the extra pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not al huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a television screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the total workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the a good number of controversial points. In television screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the a good number of beneficial graphic superior as a rule. as efficiently through viewing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness capabilities is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a terrific option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is practical to become a higher capabilities when playing in a arduous solution the a good number of up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which television screen would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of attention-grabbing option. You can view extra code and open different apps on once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are terrific choices. Another some other would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your body to editing video or music recording ultra-widescreen displays are the terrific choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for al who make use of several plans on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you do the job on 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as plans and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are extra attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put support for know-how such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the predicament having some 32" having 1440p resolution make sure you perform on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly extra effective PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stages of element in games and we will become to perform having adjustments on substantial or mega stages without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the a good number of beneficial right now.