ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK
ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 UK
- 27 inch full HD monitor with 1 ms (GTG) quick response time to eliminate ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
- ASUS-exclusive GamePlus provides crosshair and timer function for better gaming experience
- The TÜV Rheinland-certified ASUS flicker-free and low blue light technologies
- Extensive connectivity including, dual HDMI and D-sub ports; plus 2 W stereo speakers
Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors
Asus VP278H27 1920x1080 169 300cdm VP278H Monitors Monitors
►ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 x 1080 Gaming Monitor (1 ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified) UK
ASUS VP278H 27 inch FHD 1920 1080 Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Invision® PC Monitor Arm – Ergonomic Gas-Assisted Full Motion Single Arm Desktop Mount for 17–27" Screens Adjustable Tilt Swivel with Desk Clamp VESA 75x75mm - 100x100mm. Weight 2kg to 6.5kg (MX150)
- ADMI GTX 1060 GAMING PC: High-End VR Ready Gaming Desktop Computer: Intel Core i5 7400 3.5Ghz Quad Core CPU / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 4K VR Ready Graphics Card / 16GB 1600MHz DDR4 RAM / 1TB Hard Drive / 500W PSU Bronze Rated / HD Audio / USB 3.0 / HDMI/4K Ultra HD Support / VR / Oculus Support / Game Max Titan Gaming Case - Blue LED / DVDRW 24x / Pre-Installed with Windows 10
- XIAOMAN HDMI to DVI Cable 2m, High Speed Bi-Directional HDMI HDTV to DVI Male to Male Support 1080P for PS3, PS4, DVD, Computer, HDTV, Projector and Graphics Card
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electricity needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideally suited to use one television screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, do the job automation... What is the ideally suited screen?
As you know, in the market space there is a ended offer of screens. There are panoramic, seriously panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to have clean of opting for the 1st one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideally suited PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would just like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards have your ideally suited screen, but with least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fulfills nicely by using almost all of the numerous articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving manner to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of experiencing almost all video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the seriously panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to appreciate the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a quickly review to have them well located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become seriously panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important issue the television screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the experiencing distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a television screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the almost all controversial points. In television screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideally suited graphic leve as a rule. together by using experiencing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is greater than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to greater response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is possible to have a higher operation when playing in a asking for manner the almost all up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which television screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all intriguing option. You can view a lot more code and open different apps with once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or seriously panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another alternate would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or audio system ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the market space toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who make use of several plans with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in seriously superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you do the job with 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as plans and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest possible refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring support for systems just like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the predicament by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution make sure you carry out with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more effective PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stages of element in games and we will have to carry out by using adjustments with superior or seriously stages with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideally suited right now.