AOC 21 5 inch LED Monitor DVI UK
- Display diagonal: 21.5 inch, display brightness: 250 cd/m, response time (Typical): 1 ms
- Display screen resolution: 1920 x 1080p, RMS rated power: 2 W
- Cable lock slot: Kensington, VESA mounting interfaces: 100 x 100 mm, swivel angle range: 45-45
- AC input voltage: 100-240 V, AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz, power consumption (standby): 0.5 W
- Narrow Edge - ultra narrow bezel 15 mm
AOC Value E2270SWDN LED monitor 215 1920 x 1080 TN 200 cdm2 5 ms DVID VGA black E2270SWDN Monitors Monitors
215 1920 X 1080 TN 200 Cdm2 5 Ms DVID VGA Black E2270SWDN Monitors Monitors
AOC 21 5 inch LED Monitor DVI Related Posts
- CPO 3M DVI Cable, DVI-D 24+1 Pin Full Dual Link Monitor Lead - Black
- Logitech MK120 Desktop Keyboard and Mouse for Windows and Linux - QWERTY, UK Layout
- XFX HD-545X-ZCH2 Graphics Card (ATI Radeon HD 5450 1 GB PCI-E GDDR3 Memory DVI HDMI 1 GPU)
- Toshiba P300 High Performance 1TB Internal Hard Drive (Bulk) 3.5 Inch SATA - HDWD110UZSVA
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one filter or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a extensive offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this devoid of counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be more attractive. So, to avoid opting for the initial one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward love your ideal screen, but during least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely because of most of the several subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but because of the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving approach to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that during the time of taking a look during most videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not during all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. because of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration devoid of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a rapid review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important place the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look during distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit during a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the existing workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go because of one of the most controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best impression high-quality as a rule. equally because of taking a look during angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is practical to love a higher operation when playing in a asking for approach the most current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the topic of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most appealing option. You can view more code and open a assortment of apps during once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are good choices. Another choice would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or appear knowledge ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who get use of several apps during the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super excessive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you deliver the results during 1080p being able to watch the video devoid of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as apps and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add more assistance for know-how enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher because of 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance because of some 32" because of 1440p resolution get sure you enjoy during an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more successful PC during the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tiers of element in games and we will obtain to enjoy because of adjustments during excessive or super tiers devoid of penalizing the number of frames per second. For asking for players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.