Dell S2716DG 27 inch TN Gaming Monitor (1 ms Response Time, QHD 2560 x 1440 at 144 Hz, Nvidia G Sync HDMI/DP/USB) Black UK
Dell S2716DG 27 inch TN Gaming UK
- Experience sharp, undistorted moving images with NVIDIA G-Sync and the fast refresh rate at 144 Hz
- Lose yourself in the details of QHD (2560 x 1440 at 144 Hz) resolution - close to two times more details than full HD
- Enjoy swift and responsive action with minimum input lag at a rapid 1 ms panel response time
- With tilt, pivot, swivel and height adjustable features and ultra-thin bezel design, find your ideal viewing position and game for long hours comfortably
- 3 years basic warranty with advanced exchange
Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2716DG 69cm 27 Black UK created in loudspeakers DP present Port HDMI NVIDIA GSYNC Technolgy 3Yr Basic having leading-edge Exchange Minimum warrantee 210AGUL Monitors Monitors
69cm 27 Black UK created In
loudspeakers DP present Port HDMI
NVIDIA GSYNC Technolgy 3Yr Basic having leading-edge Exchange Minimum warrantee 210AGUL Monitors Monitors
►Dell S2716DG 27-inch TN Gaming Monitor (1 ms Response Time, QHD 2560 x 1440 located at 144 Hz, Nvidia G-Sync HDMI/DP/USB) - Black UK
Dell S2716DG 27 inch TN Gaming Related Posts
- ASUS Intel 1151 Socket Z370 Chipset Strix E D4 ATX Motherboard - Black
- Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2 GHz QuadCore 8MB Cache Processor
- EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 GAMING, 11GB GDDR5X, iCX Technology - 9 Thermal Sensors & RGB LED G/P/M, Asynch Fan, Optimized Airflow Design Graphics Card 11G-P4-6593-KR
- MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 10-Series 8 GB GDDR5X 10010 MHz Graphics Card - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the wonderful to use one screen or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, perform automation... What is the wonderful screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a concluded offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to discover which option would be more attractive. So, to stop opting for the initial one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the wonderful PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently achieve your ideally suited screen, but located at least you will discover what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely having virtually all of the multi-media articles and other content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving solution to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that located at the time of browsing virtually all movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not located at all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to acquire pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a rapid review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might possibly think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important position the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit located at a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to acquire into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the virtually all controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the wonderful graphic outstanding as a rule. every solo of some of those as a result of browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is achievable to achieve a higher performance when playing in a stressful solution the virtually all recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all fascinating option. You can view more code and open a variety of apps located at once to acquire advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are great choices. Another alternative would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or music knowledge ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who produce use of several plans located at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you perform located at 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as plans and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring preserve for innovations enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the court case having some 32" having 1440p resolution produce sure you play the game located at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more highly effective PC located at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of aspect in games and we will pick up to play the game having adjustments located at huge or very stage without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the wonderful right now.