Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen Full HD Monitor (16:9, LED, 1 ms, 100M:1, ACM, 250nits, DVI, HDMI, Audio Out, Acer EcoDisplay) Black UK
Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen UK
- The 1920 x 1080 resolution of the Acer S271HLFBID LED monitors delivers high detail
- Acer S271HLFBID monitors showcase a slim, space-conscious design
- Extensive connectivity: VGA, DVI (with HDCP), HDMI
- Acer eColour management optimizes image performance
- Impressive 100 million:1 contrast ratio. Color Supported-16.7 million. Brightness-300 cd/m²
Acer S271HLFbid27 vast 169 FHD LED 1ms 100M1 ACM 250nits black DVI wHDCP HDMI audio tracks Out MPRII EuroUK EMEA Acer EcoDisplay UMHS1EEF01 Monitors Monitors
vast 169 FHD LED
1ms 100M1 ACM 250nits
Black DVI WHDCP HDMI audio tracks Out MPRII EuroUK EMEA Acer EcoDisplay UMHS1EEF01 Monitors Monitors
►Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen filled HD Monitor (16:9, LED, 1 ms, 100M:1, ACM, 250nits, DVI, HDMI, audio tracks Out, Acer EcoDisplay) - Black UK
Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen Related Posts
- North Bayou Full Motion Computer Monitor Desk Mount Stand for 17-27 Inch Swivel LCD Monitor Arm with Gas Spring
- Invision® PC Monitor Arm – Ergonomic Gas-Assisted Full Motion Single Arm Desktop Mount for 17–27" Screens Adjustable Tilt Swivel with Desk Clamp VESA 75x75mm - 100x100mm. Weight 2kg to 6.5kg (MX150)
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- CiT 1015BS Micro ATX Case with 500W Power Supply Unit - Gloss Black/Silver
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most beneficial to use one display screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, get the job done automation... What is the most beneficial screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, especially panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be much more attractive. So, to refrain from opting for the initially one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most beneficial PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward acquire your ideally suited screen, but at least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and different aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely using most of the multimedia system content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use different aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving option to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of browsing most video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the especially panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to have enjoyable with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a rapid review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In different options that do not become especially panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important level the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the common workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to acquire into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the most controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most beneficial persona superior as a rule. both by using browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness overal is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of different technologies, it is potential to acquire a higher overal when playing in a tense option the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most significant option. You can view much more code and open an array of apps at once to acquire advantage of multitasking. 1440p or especially panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another alternative would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who get use of several programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in especially great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you get the job done at 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as programs and different tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the greatest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring help support for technologica enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the situation using some 32" using 1440p resolution get sure you have fun with at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more amazing PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of information in games and we will become to have fun with using adjustments at great or especially level lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most beneficial right now.