ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming UK
- 28-inch 4K UHD (3840x2160) monitor for photo-realistic visuals
- Lightning-fast 1 ms rapid response time and Adaptive-Sync technology for smooth and fast gaming visuals
- Displayport 1.2, HDMI (v 2.0) for 4K UHD playback; two USB 3.0 ports for quick-charging to your mobile devices
- ASUS Ultra-Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, GamePlus and GameVisual technologies provide tactical assistance on your command
Asus MG28UQ LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K UHD 2160p TN 330 cdm 10001 1 ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort sound system black 90LM027CB01170 Monitors Monitors
Monitor 28 3840
X 2160 4K UHD 2160p
TN 330 Cdm 10001 1 Ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort sound system Black 90LM027CB01170 Monitors Monitors
ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming Related Posts
- CSL - 3m (metres) Ultra HD Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- CSL - 2m (metres) Ultra HD 4K Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- CSL - 1m (metre) Ultra HD 4K Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- Xbox One X 1TB Console
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the greatest to use one filter or another. And is that the go by of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the greatest screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a 100 % offer of screens. There are panoramic, mega panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this not having counting the different built in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be much more attractive. So, to stop opting for the first of all one you see or the one that the vast majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the greatest PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward obtain your best screen, but by least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you earn of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and some other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that works with nicely together with the vast majority of of the multimedia articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but together with the advent of flat screens began to use some other aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving technique to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of looking by the vast majority of video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. actually so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the mega panoramic displays are becoming popular. together with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to delight in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration not having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. actually so I will do a easy review to have them effectively located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In some other options that do not become mega panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might possibly think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the vast majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important point the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking by distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed appearance and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring effectively is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the complete workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go together with one of the the vast majority of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the greatest appearance outstanding as a rule. as effectively by looking by angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a amazing option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of some other technologies, it is doable to obtain a higher performance when playing in a difficult technique the latest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be the vast majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the vast majority of useful option. You can view much more code and open many different apps by once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or mega panoramic panels are amazing choices. Another replacement would be to earn use of two screens 1080p, being able to put one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or tone go by ultra-widescreen displays are the amazing choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who earn use of several programs by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in mega significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. actually if you job by 1080p being able to watch the video not having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as effectively as programs and some other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring assist for systems want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher together with 1080p resolution or as is the event together with some 32" together with 1440p resolution earn sure you play by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more robust PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of depth in games and we will get to play together with adjustments by significant or mega stage not having penalizing the number of frames per second. For difficult players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the greatest right now.