ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming UK
- 28-inch 4K UHD (3840x2160) monitor for photo-realistic visuals
- Lightning-fast 1 ms rapid response time and Adaptive-Sync technology for smooth and fast gaming visuals
- Displayport 1.2, HDMI (v 2.0) for 4K UHD playback; two USB 3.0 ports for quick-charging to your mobile devices
- ASUS Ultra-Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, GamePlus and GameVisual technologies provide tactical assistance on your command
ASUS MG28UQ LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K TN 330 cdm2 10001 1 ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort people black MG28UQ Monitors Monitors
28 3840 X
2160 4K TN 330 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort people Black MG28UQ Monitors Monitors
ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming Related Posts
- CSL - 3m (metres) Ultra HD Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- CSL - 1m (metre) Ultra HD 4K Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- Razer Kraken 7.1 Chroma V2 USB Gaming Headset and 7.1 Surround Sound with 50 mm Drivers, Retractable Digital Microphone and Chroma Lighting
- Sony PlayStation 4 Pro 1TB
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the virtually all suitable to use one display or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, company automation... What is the virtually all suitable screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, maximal HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to avert opting for the earliest one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the virtually all suitable PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the streets get your virtually all suitable screen, but at least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that matches nicely with virtually all of the media written content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while individuals of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving strategy to individuals of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of observing virtually all video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from maximal HD to 4K real
No have to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a quickly review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, individuals of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one can think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important place the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a maximal HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not individuals huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the overall workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the virtually all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the virtually all suitable photo top quality as a rule. both thru observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is likely to get a higher efficiency when playing in a strenuous strategy the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all fascinating option. You can view significantly more code and open an array of apps at once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another alternate would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for individuals who help make use of several functions at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you perform at 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have to have a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as functions and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add guidance for engineering for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the scenario with some 32" with 1440p resolution help make sure you carry out at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater place of element in games and we will get to carry out with adjustments at superior or very place while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the virtually all suitable right now.