ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming UK
- 28-inch 4K UHD (3840x2160) monitor for photo-realistic visuals
- Lightning-fast 1 ms rapid response time and Adaptive-Sync technology for smooth and fast gaming visuals
- Displayport 1.2, HDMI (v 2.0) for 4K UHD playback; two USB 3.0 ports for quick-charging to your mobile devices
- ASUS Ultra-Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, GamePlus and GameVisual technologies provide tactical assistance on your command
Asus MG28UQ LED monitor 28 3840 x 2160 4K TN 330 cdm 10001 1 ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort loudspeakers black 90LM027CB01170 Monitors Monitors
Monitor 28 3840
X 2160 4K TN
330 Cdm 10001 1 Ms 3xHDMI DisplayPort loudspeakers Black 90LM027CB01170 Monitors Monitors
ASUS MG28UQ 4K 3840x2160 Gaming Related Posts
- CSL - 1m (metre) Ultra HD 4K Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- CSL - 3m (metres) Ultra HD Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
- UGREEN Mini DP to DP Cable, 2m Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable at 4K Resolution with Audio, Thunderbolt Compatible for Surface Pro 4/3, Macbook Air, Macbook Pro, Mac mini to Monitors, Projectors etc
- CSL - 2m (metres) Ultra HD 4K Displayport 1.2v (DP) on Displayport 1.2v (DP) cable with latches incl. audio transmission | certified | Apple and PC
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one filter or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a comprehensive offer of screens. There are panoramic, extra panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with out counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be even more attractive. So, to reside clear of opting for the 1st one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future become your great screen, but for least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely along with a lot of of the multimedia programs articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but along with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving solution to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that for the time of viewing a lot of video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not for all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extra panoramic displays are becoming popular. along with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to delight in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with out having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a fast review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become extra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important place the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the viewing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit for a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or numerous movements to see the existing workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go along with one of the a lot of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred photo quality as a rule. for the same time by solution of viewing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always great for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is achievable to become a higher performance when playing in a strenuous solution the a lot of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the problem of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be special cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of appealing option. You can view even more code and open many different apps for once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extra panoramic panels are good choices. Another alternative would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to site one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who make use of several packages for the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extra major definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you function for 1080p being able to watch the video with out having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a amazing graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as packages and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the top refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we develop support for modern advances like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher along with 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance along with some 32" along with 1440p resolution make sure you execute for an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more amazing PC for the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater site of depth in games and we will become to execute along with adjustments for major or extra site with out penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.