Samsung S22F350 22 Inch HDMI UK
- Simple circular stand: A simple circular stand elegantly complements the super slim display
- Built from approximately 30% recycled plastic, with less than 0.005W off-mode power consumption
- 16:10 aspect ratio for viewing legacy applications
- A professional ergonomic monitor for truly professional needs
- On Auto setting, Samsung's eco-saving technology fluidly adjusts display brightness based on the luminescence of
- Adjustable Display
- Contrast Ratio Static : 1000:1(Typ.), 700:1(Min)
- Dynamic Contrast Ratio : Mega
Samsung SF350 Series S22F350FHU LED monitor 22 1920 x 1080 TN 200 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI VGA shiny black LS22F350FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 22
1920 X 1080 TN 200 Cdm2 10001 5 Ms HDMI VGA Shiny Black LS22F350FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung S22F350 22 Inch HDMI Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Dell Inspiron 3000 Desktop - (Black) (Intel i3, 8 GB RAM, 1 TB HDD, Window 10)
- HP Slimline 410-135na Desktop PC (Intel Core i3-4170, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, 1 TB 7200 rpm SATA HDD, Intel HD Graphics 4400, Windows 10) - Black
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the potential needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the appropriate to use one monitor or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the appropriate screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a done offer of screens. There are panoramic, seriously panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different enclosed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the first of all one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the appropriate PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future acquire your appropriate screen, but with least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely by using most of the rich subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while the of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving strategy to the of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that with the time of browsing most movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not with all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the seriously panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to similar to the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a quickly review to have them clearly located, especially to see the ones presented according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become seriously panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one probably think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not the huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring clearly is key. If you are going to sit with a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or constant movements to see the complete workspace. Also, depending upon on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the most controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the appropriate photo top quality as a rule. as clearly by using browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is conceivable to acquire a higher operation when playing in a tense strategy the most recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most unique option. You can view significantly more code and open many apps with once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or seriously panoramic panels are very good choices. Another different would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to destination one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate you to editing video or music and songs ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the who make use of several software programs with the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in seriously substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you work with 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a seriously powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as clearly as software programs and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the finest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add significantly more support for innovation similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the scenario by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution make sure you have up with an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more seriously powerful PC with the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of detail in games and we will become to have up by using adjustments with substantial or seriously stage without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the appropriate right now.