Samsung S27F350 27 Inch PLS HDMI UK
- Powerful multitasking features for maximum productivity
- Discover the detail of stunningly realistic UHD picture quality
- Eco-friendly materials with Intertek Green Leaf certification
- Optional mountable USB soundbar
- A professional ergonomic monitor for truly professional needs
- Adjustable Display
Samsung SF350 Series S27F350FHU LED monitor 27 1920 x 1080 Plane to set converting PLS 250 cdm2 10001 4 ms HDMI VGA shiny black LS27F350FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
S27F350FHU LED Monitor
27 1920 X 1080 Plane
To set converting PLS 250 Cdm2 10001 4 Ms HDMI VGA Shiny Black LS27F350FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung S27F350 27 Inch PLS HDMI Related Posts
- HDMI Cable, Rankie 2-Pack 1.8m High-Speed HDMI 2.0 HDTV Cable - Supports Ethernet, 3D, 4K and Audio Return (Black) - R1108
- USB 3.0 to VGA Adapter Converter,TOPELEK 1080P USB to VGA Video Graphic Card Display External Cable Adapter for PC Laptop Windows 7/8/8.1/10/ etc, Not Support MAC(Apple) Systems,Tablets and Windows XP
- Samsung S27E330 27-Inch LED Monitor
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the almost all useful to use one monitor or another. And is that the think of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the almost all useful screen?
As you know, in the market there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different offered technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be more attractive. So, to avoid opting for the first of all one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the almost all useful PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would have a preference for you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on gain your ideally suited screen, but on least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovation and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely with almost all of the multimedia techniques content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving technique to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of seeing almost all video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to receive pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No require to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a swift review to have them good located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important level the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or typical movements to see the whole workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the almost all controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the almost all useful impression of quality as a rule. perhaps because of seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is more useful than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to more useful response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is practical to gain a higher performance when playing in a tense technique the almost all up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all unique option. You can view more code and open a number of apps on once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are very good choices. Another option would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate your own self to editing video or sensible recording ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the market toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who get use of several software programs on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly raised definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you do the job on 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you require a potent graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as software programs and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the finest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put aid for innovation have a preference for Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the situation with some 32" with 1440p resolution get sure you perform on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more potent PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater grade of fine detail in games and we will receive to perform with adjustments on raised or particularly grade while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the almost all useful right now.