Samsung C24F390 24 Inch Curved UK
- 1800 R screen and eye saver mode for increased viewing comfort
- High image quality with Samsung's Advanced Display technology
- Enhanced gaming experience with free sync and game mode
- 3,000:1 contrast ratio gives deeper black, more pristine whites and sharper detail
- Premium quality fast 4 ms VA panel
- Enjoy a truly immersive viewing experience
- Reduce eyestrain with Eye Saver Mode
- Experience a best-in-class contrast ratio
Samsung LC24F390FHUXEN VGA HDMI LC24F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung LC24F390FHUXEN VGA HDMI LC24F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung C24F390 24 Inch Curved Related Posts
- VonHaus Single Arm LCD LED Monitor Desk Mount Bracket for 13"-27" Screens with 45° Tilt, 360° Rotation & 180° Pull Out Swivel Arm - Max VESA 100x100
- AmazonBasics DVI to HDMI Adapter Cable (Latest Standard) - 0.9/1.8/3/4.6/7.6 m
- Samsung S24F350 24" PLS HDMI LED Monitor - Black
- Corsair CC-9011083-WW Carbide Series SPEC-ALPHA Windowed Mid-Tower ATX Gaming Computer Case - White/Red
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electrica needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one display screen or another. And is that the working experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, get the job done automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the market destination there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to avoid opting for the first of all one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the route realize your ideally suited screen, but from least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely through a good number of of the media articles that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but through the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving option to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of visiting a good number of video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. through a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to have pleasure from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a easy review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perfectly think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important factor the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the extensive workspace. Also, based upon on the size, you also have to get into account the resolution.
And we go through one of the a good number of controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred persona superior quality as a rule. the two through visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is a lot more reliable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to a lot more reliable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a superb option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is practical to realize a higher operation when playing in a difficult option the a good number of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of exciting option. You can view a lot more code and open an array of apps from once to get advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are superb choices. Another alternative would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to destination one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or mp3 ultra-widescreen displays are the superb choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having to choose from toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who come up with use of several programs from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you get the job done from 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a sturdy graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as programs and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add support for technologica for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher through 1080p resolution or as is the claim through some 32" through 1440p resolution come up with sure you get up from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more sturdy PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater destination of feature in games and we will have to get up through adjustments from great or extremely destination without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For difficult players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.