Acer R271bmid 27 Inch tremendous FHD UK
- With an ultra-thin enclosure of only 6.6 mm, the R1 Series monitors are thinner than many smartphones
- On the exquisitely crisp screen movies and games become even more immersive, while presentations appear in dynamic brightness
- R1 Series monitors let you revel in super-sharp visuals and bring you into a colourful world of full high definition
- Provides splendid quality in wide angles with in-plane switching panel; Accurate across 178 degrees. No grey-level inversion or colour washout
- Zero-frame design provides the maximum viewing experience and support multi-monitor setups
Acer R271 LED monitor 27 1920 x 1080 IPS 250 cdm2 4 ms HDMI DVI VGA people black UMHR1EE001 Monitors Monitors
X 1080 IPS 250 Cdm2 4 Ms HDMI DVI VGA people Black UMHR1EE001 Monitors Monitors
Acer R271bmid 27 Inch tremendous FHD Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen Full HD Monitor (16:9, LED, 1 ms, 100M:1, ACM, 250nits, DVI, HDMI, Audio Out, Acer EcoDisplay) - Black
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 2400 MHz C16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
- Zotac GeForce GTX 1050Ti 4 GB Mini Graphics Card - Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one filter or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extremely panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this with no counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to realize which option would be more attractive. So, to be clean of opting for the earliest one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on access your ideal screen, but during least you will realize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that complements nicely using nearly all of the hiburan material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while individuals of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving option to individuals of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that during the time of taking a look during nearly all online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not during all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extremely panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to take on pleasure in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration with no having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No wil to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a speedy review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones featured according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become extremely panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, individuals of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important factor the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look during distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not individuals huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit during a distance of less than one meter you have to lookup for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to take on into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the nearly all controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best impression leve as a rule. both equally by using taking a look during angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness outcome is more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is likely to access a higher outcome when playing in a challenging option the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all appealing option. You can view more code and open many different apps during once to take on advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extremely panoramic panels are very good choices. Another other would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or music experience ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for individuals who produce use of several programs during the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extremely great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you get the job done during 1080p being able to watch the video with no having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you wil a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as programs and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add experience for technologies such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the situation using some 32" using 1440p resolution produce sure you have fun with during an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more powerful PC during the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of details in games and we will have to have fun with using adjustments during great or extremely level with no penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.